A Declarative Language for Building And Orchestrating LLM-Powered Agent Workflows
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents
Abstract (arXiv)
Building deployment-ready LLM agents requires complex orchestration of tools, data sources, and control flow logic, yet existing systems tightly couple agent logic to specific programming languages and deployment models. We present a declarative system that separates agent workflow specification from implementation, enabling the same pipeline definition to execute across multiple backend languages (Java, Python, Go) and deployment environments (cloud-native, on-premises). Our key insight is that most agent workflows consist of common patterns -- data serialization, filtering, RAG retrieval, API orchestration -- that can be expressed through a unified DSL rather than imperative code. This approach transforms agent development from application programming to configuration, where adding new tools or fine-tuning agent behaviors requires only pipeline specification changes, not code deployment. Our system natively supports A/B testing of agent strategies, allowing multiple pipeline variants to run on the same backend infrastructure with automatic metric collection and comparison. We evaluate our approach on real-world e-commerce workflows at PayPal, processing millions of daily interactions. Our results demonstrate 60% reduction in development time, and 3x improvement in deployment velocity compared to imperative implementations. The language's declarative approach enables non-engineers to modify agent behaviors safely, while maintaining sub-100ms orchestration overhead. We show that complex workflows involving product search, personalization, and cart management can be expressed in under 50 lines of DSL compared to 500+ lines of imperative code.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 0 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2025.
Builds on
0 of 8 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Pythia: Exploiting Workflow Predictability for Efficient Agent-Native LLM Serving
- 2026Compiling Agentic Workflows into LLM Weights: Near-Frontier Quality at Two Orders of Magnitude Less Cost
- 2026AgentSPEX: An Agent SPecification and EXecution Language
- 2026Do More Agents Help? Controlled and Protocol-Aligned Evaluation of LLM Agent Workflows
- 2026CURATE: Leveraging LLM Agents to Compose, Catalog, and Deploy Reproducible Workflows
- 2026Orchestral AI: A Framework for Agent Orchestration
- 2025Benchmarking and Studying the LLM-based Agent System in End-to-End Software Development
- 2026Orla: A Library for Serving LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems