mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Reward Was in Your Data All Along: Correcting Flow Matching with Discriminator-Guided RL

arXiv 2606.19162 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion and flow policies for robotics

also in 2 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Score- and flow-matching models often rely on preference-based reinforcement learning for two purposes: aligning with subjective preferences and, surprisingly, recovering properties such as visual realism and coherent object structure that matching-based training is intended to learn from the data itself. We argue that this reflects a structural mismatch. Matching losses measure ℓ2 regression error on the velocity or score field under training-time marginals, a proxy poorly aligned with the visual and semantic properties that determine sample quality at inference. Given a reward aligned with these properties, RL sidesteps the mismatch by evaluating the model on its own samples and following the reward landscape directly. The challenge is to obtain such a reward without relying on human preferences, which are expensive and conflate data realism with annotator inclinations. We propose Discriminator-Guided RL (DRL). DRL trains a discriminator to separate data from base-model samples in a pretrained representation space and uses its logit as the reward in KL-regularized RL. The pretrained space restricts the discriminator to perceptually meaningful directions, and the logit estimates the log-likelihood ratio between data and model, which is the optimal reward for targeting the data distribution. Across SiT, JiT, REPA, and RAE, DRL reduces guidance-free FID (e.g., 9.38 → 2.62 on SiT) and semantic-space FD (e.g., 88.2 → 19.3 on DINOv3 for SiT), with consistent gains across all backbones, and improves human-preference rewards without training on them. It also yields a better Pareto frontier between preference reward and image fidelity under subsequent preference-based post-training, increasing alignment while reducing low-level artifacts such as oversaturation and excessive brightness.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and flow policies for robotics, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 25 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

Builds on

25 of 78 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Data-regularized Reinforcement Learning for Diffusion Models at Scale3 Dec
  2. 2025Flow-GRPO: Training Flow Matching Models via Online RL8 May

Other references · 23

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
  4. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  5. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
  6. 2025DINOv3cited by 1,414
  7. 2023Human Preference Score v2: A Solid Benchmark for Evaluating Human Preferences of Text-to-Image Synthesiscited by 890
  8. 2024Representation Alignment for Generation: Training Diffusion Transformers Is Easier Than You Thinkcited by 703
  9. 2021Tackling the Generative Learning Trilemma with Denoising Diffusion GANscited by 516
  10. 2026Reinforcement Learning via Self-Distillationcited by 332
  11. 2025Diffusion Transformers with Representation Autoencoderscited by 295
  12. 2025Improving Video Generation with Human Feedbackcited by 284
11 more
  1. 2018cGANs with Projection Discriminatorcited by 254
  2. 2026Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learningcited by 247
  3. 2023Elucidating the Exposure Bias in Diffusion Modelscited by 101
  4. 2020Adversarial score matching and improved sampling for image generationcited by 96
  5. 2023Finetuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Fairnesscited by 92
  6. 2023Input Perturbation Reduces Exposure Bias in Diffusion Modelscited by 90
  7. 2023Alleviating Exposure Bias in Diffusion Models through Sampling with Shifted Time Stepscited by 73
  8. 2023On Error Propagation of Diffusion Modelscited by 31
  9. 2025Tilt Matching for Scalable Sampling and Fine-Tuningcited by 22
  10. 2025Back to Basics: Let Denoising Generative Models Denoisecited by 16
  11. 2025Calibrating Generative Models to Distributional Constraintscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Reinforce Adjoint Matching: Scaling RL Post-Training of Diffusion and Flow-Matching Models
  2. 2024Preference Alignment with Flow Matching
  3. 2026Reward Score Matching: Unifying Reward-based Fine-tuning for Flow and Diffusion Models
  4. 2026Enhancing VLM Reward Models Through Structure-Aware Fine-Tuning
  5. 2026Exploring the Design Space of Reward Backpropagation for Flow Matching
  6. 2025Similarity as Reward Alignment: Robust and Versatile Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026What Does Flow Matching Bring To TD Learning?
  8. 2026MEND: RL For Flow Models via Proximal Velocity Matching