mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Semantic Adapter Routing with Fine-Tuning Task Embeddings

arXiv 2606.19079 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has led to model ecosystems in which a single backbone is paired with many task-specialized adapters. Given such a library, routing aims to select the most appropriate adapter for a user query. While existing adapter routers typically require access to adapter weights or supervised training, we develop training-free semantic adapter routing methods using task embeddings. In ARIADNE, we reframe adapter selection as a classification problem, where PEFT adapters are represented by task embeddings and an unlabeled query is routed to the nearest adapter in the encoder's latent space. Evaluated on 23 tasks, ARIADNE recovers 97.4% of Oracle task performance and scales to 44 adapters at 89.7% selection accuracy, without touching a single adapter parameter. However, training data needed for ARIADNE may not be available when adapters come from public hubs or third-party providers. To overcome this limitation, we introduce GRACE, which recovers an adapter's fine-tuning data from its output logits alone via a modified contrastive decoding diffing (CDD) procedure. Synthetic data generated from CDD-UM is then used to construct task embeddings. Across three backbones (Llama-3.2-1B, Qwen2.5-3B, Qwen2.5-32B), GRACE recovers 72--100% of Oracle task accuracy and matches or exceeds ARROW on 48 of 69 task/backbone combinations, while requiring neither training data nor model weights. Overall, we demonstrate that fine-tuning task embeddings provide an accurate and efficient path to semantic adapter routing.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

Builds on

18 of 24 references.

References · 18

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  3. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  4. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  5. 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,261
  6. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
  7. 2021DExperts: Decoding-Time Controlled Text Generation with Experts and Anti-Expertscited by 441
  8. 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 376
  9. 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 372
  10. 2023VeRA: Vector-based Random Matrix Adaptationcited by 300
  11. 2023Domain Specialization as the Key to Make Large Language Models Disruptive: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 135
  12. 2024Towards Modular LLMs by Building and Reusing a Library of LoRAscited by 72
6 more
  1. 2024LoraRetriever: Input-Aware LoRA Retrieval and Composition for Mixed Tasks in the Wildcited by 68
  2. 2024Merging LoRAs like Playing LEGO: Pushing the Modularity of LoRA to Extremes Through Rank-Wise Clusteringcited by 59
  3. 2025Representation-based Broad Hallucination Detectors Fail to Generalize Out of Distributioncited by 4
  4. 2025HiLoRA: Adaptive Hierarchical LoRA Routing for Training-Free Domain Generalizationcited by 4
  5. 2026Reading the Finetuning Prior: Verbatim Content Recovery via Contrastive Decoding Diffingcited by 2
  6. 2026GPart: End-to-End Isometric Fine-Tuning via Global Parameter Partitioningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.