Sensor Configuration Matters: A Systematic Evaluation of Multimodal SLAM on Quadruped Robots
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous navigation of quadrupedal robots in diverse environments fundamentally relies on resilient Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM). While visual-inertial SLAM has matured across wheeled, handheld, and aerial platforms, a critical evaluation gap remains regarding how hardware-level sensor configurations affect performance under the aggressive dynamics of legged locomotion. Quadrupeds introduce distinct embodiment-induced sensory challenges, including foot-impact shocks, high-frequency mechanical vibrations, and rapid angular rotations, which degrade standard perception pipelines. To address this gap, we present a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art visual, visual-inertial, and LiDAR-visual-inertial SLAM methods using the GrandTour dataset recorded on an ANYmal D quadruped. We isolate and quantify the impacts of camera modalities, shutter techniques, and inertial sensor tiers, analyzing their trade-offs across localization accuracy, algorithmic robustness, and computational resource utilization. Our empirical findings demonstrate that hardware selection has substantial influence on system resilience: stereo configurations consistently outperform monocular and RGB-D modalities, global shutter cameras significantly mitigate motion-induced tracking failures compared to rolling shutter cameras, and, crucially, standard inertial integration can degrade the performance of primarily vision-based frameworks under harsh legged locomotion. These insights additionally offer concrete design guidelines for tailoring custom sensor payloads to achieve dependable perception on agile legged systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.
Builds on
19 of 31 references.
References · 19
- 2020ORB-SLAM3: An Accurate Open-Source Library for Visual, Visual-Inertial and Multi-Map SLAMcited by 878
- 2020TartanAir: A Dataset to Push the Limits of Visual SLAMcited by 506
- 2022Learning robust perceptive locomotion for quadrupedal robots in the wildcited by 382
- 2022Deep Patch Visual Odometrycited by 190
- 2018The TUM VI Benchmark for Evaluating Visual-Inertial Odometrycited by 99
- 2024Deep Patch Visual SLAMcited by 71
- 2024RTAB-Map as an Open-Source Lidar and Visual SLAM Library for Large-Scale and Long-Term Online Operationcited by 62
- 2023Fast Traversability Estimation for Wild Visual Navigationcited by 44
- 2024FAST-LIVO2: Fast, Direct LiDAR-Inertial-Visual Odometrycited by 44
- 2021VILENS: Visual, Inertial, Lidar, and Leg Odometry for All-Terrain Legged Robotscited by 25
- 2023SubT-MRS Dataset: Pushing SLAM Towards All-weather Environmentscited by 24
- 2022FusionPortable: A Multi-Sensor Campus-Scene Dataset for Evaluation of Localization and Mapping Accuracy on Diverse Platformscited by 15
7 more
- 2024FusionPortableV2: A Unified Multi-Sensor Dataset for Generalized SLAM Across Diverse Platforms and Scalable Environmentscited by 15
- 2025Boxi: Design Decisions in the Context of Algorithmic Performance for Roboticscited by 10
- 2026GrandTour: A Legged Robotics Dataset in the Wild for Multi-Modal Perception and State Estimationcited by 8
- 2024EnvoDat: A Large-Scale Multisensory Dataset for Robotic Spatial Awareness and Semantic Reasoning in Heterogeneous Environmentscited by 7
- 2024Visual-Inertial SLAM for Unstructured Outdoor Environments: Benchmarking the Benefits and Computational Costs of Loop Closingcited by 4
- 2024NeRF and Gaussian Splatting SLAM in the Wildcited by 3
- 2024TAIL: A Terrain-Aware Multi-Modal SLAM Dataset for Robot Locomotion in Deformable Granular Environmentscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.