mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PEFT-MedSAM: Efficient Fine-Tuning of Medical Foundation Models for Explainable Skin Lesion Segmentation

arXiv 2606.18707 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated segmentation of skin lesions using deep learning models for dermoscopic images can be very helpful in finding melanomas earlier than they would normally be detected. However, most deep learning methods available do not perform well. The aim of this paper is to present a parameter-efficient fine-tuning method called PEFT-MedSAM for adapting the Medical Segment Anything Model (MedSAM) to automatically segment dermoscopic skin lesions. The PEFT-MedSAM method uses only the lightweight mask decoder for training the model while keeping the pre-trained image encoder and prompt encoder frozen. The experiments performed on the ISIC 2018 benchmark dataset shows that PEFT-MedSAM obtains a dice coefficient of .9411 and an intersection over union value of .8918 when compared to both a fully trained U-Net baseline (.8715 dice coefficient) and zero-shot MedSAM inference (.8997 dice coefficient). The external validation of the model using PH2 dataset shows .9467 dice coefficient with +/- .0310 standard deviation. Supportive evidence for these claims include a p-value less than .0001 for Wilcoxon signed rank tests comparing the two datasets and bootstrap-estimated 95% confidence intervals of [.9364,.9447] that represent the estimated range of possible values for the average dice coefficient obtained by repeating the test. To increase clinical trustworthiness, we used Grad-CAM explainability along with a pointing game based evaluation methodology to evaluate the CNN baseline model on the validation set. The results showed that we had an accuracy rate of 98.27% on the validation set of 519 images and confirmed that the model classified regions containing skin lesions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

Builds on

19 of 60 references.

References · 19

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  5. 2019Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 657
  6. 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 366
  7. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  8. 2019Embracing Imperfect Datasets: A Review of Deep Learning Solutions for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 258
  9. 2018A Novel Focal Tversky loss function with improved Attention U-Net for lesion segmentationcited by 171
  10. 2022HiFormer: Hierarchical Multi-scale Representations Using Transformers for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 94
  11. 2023MA-SAM: Modality-agnostic SAM Adaptation for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 82
  12. 2023Are Natural Domain Foundation Models Useful for Medical Image Classification?cited by 44
7 more
  1. 2023SkinSAM: Empowering Skin Cancer Segmentation with Segment Anything Modelcited by 32
  2. 2019DSNet: Automatic Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Segmentationcited by 22
  3. 2023I-MedSAM: Implicit Medical Image Segmentation with Segment Anythingcited by 22
  4. 2023Investigating Forgetting in Pre-Trained Representations Through Continual Learningcited by 19
  5. 2022Assessing the communication gap between AI models and healthcare professionals: explainability, utility and trust in AI-driven clinical decision-makingcited by 14
  6. 2024CSWin-UNet: Transformer UNet with Cross-Shaped Windows for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 12
  7. 2024Global-Local Medical SAM Adaptor Based on Full Adaptioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.