mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PACT: Preserving Anchored Cores in Task-vectors for Model Merging

arXiv 2606.18627 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Model merging has emerged as a training-free alternative to multi-task learning, aiming to combine multiple task-specific fine-tuned models into a single multi-task model. Most existing model merging approaches follow the Task Arithmetic paradigm, which decomposes fine-tuned weights into pre-trained parameters and task vectors, and performs merging exclusively in the task-vector space. The effectiveness of this paradigm implicitly relies on the assumption that task-specific knowledge is encoded solely within task vectors. We argue that this assumption generally does not hold due to the intrinsic task preferences of pre-trained models. Specifically, we identify Load-Bearing Wall (LBW) dimensions, namely some task-critical knowledge that remains embedded in the pre-trained weights rather than being fully transferred into task vectors. We characterize LBW dimensions from both scalar-weight and subspace perspectives, thereby covering the major paradigms of existing model merging methods. Our analysis reveals that, by ignoring LBW dimensions, task-vector-based approaches fail to fully resolve task conflicts and may inadvertently damage task-specific knowledge encoded in the pre-trained model, leading to degradation. To address this issue, we propose PACT, which preserves the anchored task-specific cores (i.e., LBW dimensions) within task vectors by aligning their orthogonal complements with the subspace of the pre-trained weights. These aligned subspace components are then removed from the task vectors before applying existing model merging algorithms. Furthermore, we develop an efficient variant based on randomized SVD to improve scalability. PACT can be seamlessly integrated with existing methods. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that PACT consistently enhances mainstream model merging approaches and establishes new state-of-the-art performance.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2026.

Builds on

34 of 53 references.

References · 34

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  4. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  5. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  6. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  7. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  8. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  9. 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,396
  10. 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,120
  11. 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 818
  12. 2017Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Artcited by 797
22 more
  1. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  2. 2023Language Models are Super Mario: Absorbing Abilities from Homologous Models as a Free Lunchcited by 694
  3. 2018Rotation Equivariant CNNs for Digital Pathologycited by 422
  4. 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 369
  5. 2021Gradient Projection Memory for Continual Learningcited by 348
  6. 2013Challenges in Representation Learning: A report on three machine learning contestscited by 302
  7. 2024Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunitiescited by 254
  8. 2022Patching open-vocabulary models by interpolating weightscited by 190
  9. 2024Task Singular Vectors: Reducing Task Interference in Model Mergingcited by 147
  10. 2024Localizing Task Information for Improved Model Merging and Compressioncited by 131
  11. 2024Model merging with SVD to tie the Knotscited by 122
  12. 2025No Task Left Behind: Isotropic Model Merging with Common and Task-Specific Subspacescited by 96
  13. 2023Deep Model Fusion: A Surveycited by 91
  14. 2024MetaGPT: Merging Large Language Models Using Model Exclusive Task Arithmeticcited by 53
  15. 2025Modeling Multi-Task Model Merging as Adaptive Projective Gradient Descentcited by 39
  16. 2023Concrete Subspace Learning based Interference Elimination for Multi-task Model Fusioncited by 37
  17. 2024Multi-Task Model Merging via Adaptive Weight Disentanglementcited by 22
  18. 2024MAP: Low-compute Model Merging with Amortized Pareto Fronts via Quadratic Approximationcited by 20
  19. 2025Task Arithmetic in Trust Region: A Training-Free Model Merging Approach to Navigate Knowledge Conflictscited by 13
  20. 2024Task Groupings Regularization: Data-Free Meta-Learning with Heterogeneous Pre-trained Modelscited by 12
  21. 2025From Task-Specific Models to Unified Systems: A Review of Model Merging Approachescited by 11
  22. 2025RegMean++: Enhancing Effectiveness and Generalization of Regression Mean for Model Mergingcited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.