Self-CTRL: Self-Consistency Training with Reinforcement Learning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models (LMs) that faithfully describe their own behavior can more easily be audited, understood, and trusted by users. This paper describes Self-Consistency Training with Reinforcement Learning (Self-CTRL), a method that optimizes for consistency between a LM's self-explanations and behavior on related inputs by updating explanations to better predict behavior or updating behavior to better match explanations. We apply our method in two domains. First, we study a formal probabilistic reasoning task in which LMs must learn to imitate a family of biased samplers and evaluated on their ability to report the associated biases. We find that consistency training improves the correlation between self-reported and behaviorally-measured latent biases from R2=0.24 to R2=0.64 on a set of held-out distributions, matching the generalization of direct ground-truth supervision. Second, we study a constitutional AI domain in which LMs must describe when they will refuse or comply with user requests. Here, Self-CTRL produces rules that faithfully describe the model's behavior on held-out requests, improving the refusal predictions of a third-party auditor model from 36% to 92%. In the other direction, behavior updates improve alignment, reducing HarmBench failure rate from 15.0% to 0.5% without substantially increasing refusal on harmless prompts. By aligning explanations and behavior, our work provides a general recipe for training AI models to be safer, more transparent, and more controllable.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 38 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.
Builds on
38 of 57 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback30 Mar
- 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoning28 Mar
Other references · 36
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
- 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,429
- 2023Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought Promptingcited by 1,122
- 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 1,040
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
- 2023Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 703
- 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 681
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
24 more
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 625
- 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 505
- 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 399
- 2024Alignment faking in large language modelscited by 360
- 2018Adversarial Example Generation with Syntactically Controlled Paraphrase Networkscited by 286
- 2026Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learningcited by 247
- 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 190
- 2023Taken out of context: On measuring situational awareness in LLMscited by 143
- 2025ELEPHANT: Measuring and understanding social sycophancy in LLMscited by 129
- 2025Tell me about yourself: LLMs are aware of their learned behaviorscited by 91
- 2025Auditing language models for hidden objectivescited by 83
- 2020Self-Distillation as Instance-Specific Label Smoothingcited by 71
- 2024A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agentcited by 63
- 2025OpenCodeInstruct: A Large-scale Instruction Tuning Dataset for Code LLMscited by 60
- 2024An Introduction to Centralized Training for Decentralized Execution in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
- 2025The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMscited by 36
- 2025Self-Interpretability: LLMs Can Describe Complex Internal Processes that Drive Their Decisionscited by 25
- 2026Counterfactual Simulation Training for Chain-of-Thought Faithfulnesscited by 17
- 2026A Positive Case for Faithfulness: LLM Self-Explanations Help Predict Model Behaviorcited by 13
- 2026EvoLM: Self-Evolving Language Models through Co-Evolved Discriminative Rubricscited by 13
- 2025SpecEval: Evaluating Model Adherence to Behavior Specificationscited by 9
- 2025Statutory Construction and Interpretation for Artificial Intelligencecited by 8
- 2026Do LLMs Follow Their Own Rules? A Reflexive Audit of Self-Stated Safety Policiescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Training Large Language Models for Self-Explanation Faithfulness
- 2025Certified Self-Consistency: Statistical Guarantees and Test-Time Training for Reliable Reasoning in LLMs
- 2025KnowRL: Teaching Language Models to Know What They Know
- 2026Position: It's Time to Optimize LLMs for Self-Consistency
- 2025Consistent Paths Lead to Truth: Self-Rewarding Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning
- 2025Enhancing the Outcome Reward-based RL Training of MLLMs with Self-Consistency Sampling
- 2025The Path of Self-Evolving Large Language Models: Achieving Data-Efficient Learning via Intrinsic Feedback
- 2026Reinforcement Inference: Leveraging Uncertainty for Self-Correcting Language Model Reasoning