Vision-language models for chest radiography do not always need the image
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Medical vision-language models
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language models that answer questions about chest radiographs are evaluated by their accuracy on labels derived from radiology reports. High benchmark accuracy is often interpreted as evidence that the model uses the image. A model that answers from the finding named in the question can score as well as a model that uses the radiograph. Keeping the question fixed, we audit eight open-weight systems by swapping in another patient's radiograph with the same or the opposite label, occluding the radiologist-marked region or an equal region elsewhere, and removing the radiograph or replacing it with noise or a photograph. On 2,548 yes-or-no questions from MIMIC-CXR, one multimodal model answers Yes regardless of the image, another multimodal model changes its answers without following the label, and four systems use the image but keep about half of their correct answers when the radiograph is swapped for an opposite-label radiograph. A medical model that receives only the question text scores 55.3% on the pooled questions, higher than two multimodal systems. It scores 91.8% where every finding is present, and answering Yes to every question scores 100% there. Where the image is necessary, the best multimodal system exceeds this model by 10.4% in balanced accuracy. The categories are unchanged on CheXpert. Confidence is not higher when a correct answer depends on the marked region. In a reader study with three radiologists, the two radiologists who read a balanced set of 200 cases score 86.0% and 82.0%, and the systems score 50.0% to 73.0%. Accuracy does not establish image use, but an intervention on the image can test it.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 32 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.
Builds on
32 of 50 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2024MediConfusion: Can you trust your AI radiologist? Probing the reliability of multimodal medical foundation models23 Sep
- 2024Worse than Random? An Embarrassingly Simple Probing Evaluation of Large Multimodal Models in Medical VQA30 May
- 2023LLaVA-Med: Training a Large Language-and-Vision Assistant for Biomedicine in One Day1 Jun
Other references · 29
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
- 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,969
- 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 916
- 2024Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMscited by 735
17 more
- 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
- 2025MedGemma Technical Reportcited by 436
- 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 379
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 365
- 2022Making the Most of Text Semantics to Improve Biomedical Vision--Language Processingcited by 339
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
- 2021Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Imagescited by 156
- 2024Exploring scalable medical image encoders beyond text supervisioncited by 132
- 2024CheXpert Plus: Augmenting a Large Chest X-ray Dataset with Text Radiology Reports, Patient Demographics and Additional Image Formatscited by 106
- 2020Creation and Validation of a Chest X-Ray Dataset with Eye-tracking and Report Dictation for AI Developmentcited by 56
- 2023Adversarial Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 47
- 2021How I failed machine learning in medical imaging -- shortcomings and recommendationscited by 37
- 2025ReXVQA: A Large-scale Visual Question Answering Benchmark for Generalist Chest X-ray Understandingcited by 20
- 2024RadioRAG: Online Retrieval-augmented Generation for Radiology Question Answeringcited by 10
- 2024ReXErr: Synthesizing Clinically Meaningful Errors in Diagnostic Radiology Reportscited by 9
- 2025Multi-step retrieval and reasoning improves radiology question answering with large language modelscited by 7
- 2026Safety and accuracy follow different scaling laws in clinical large language modelscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Auditing Medical Vision-Language Models on Chest Radiographs: Estimating Reference Agreement Across Institutions
- 2026Calibrated Triage, Not Autonomy: Confidence Estimation for Medical Vision-Language Models
- 2026Medical Context Distorts Decisions in Clinical Vision Language Models
- 2026Toward Guarantees for Clinical Reasoning in Vision Language Models via Formal Verification
- 2026Beyond Benchmark Scores: Auditing Medical Vision-Language Models for Chest X-Ray Tuberculosis Screening
- 2025Evaluating Reasoning Faithfulness in Medical Vision-Language Models using Multimodal Perturbations
- 2026MC-CXR: A Multi-Context Chest X-ray Benchmark for Context-Induced Disruption in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Towards Responsible Multimodal Medical Reasoning via Context-Aligned Vision-Language Models