mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DeepInsight: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure Across the Physical AI Stack

arXiv 2606.17574 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating a Physical AI stack spans operators that differ by more than three orders of magnitude -- from a single foundation-model decoding step to thousands of physics ticks of whole-body control -- varying orthogonally in modality, reward semantics, and resource profile. No existing framework spans this range, so the stack is evaluated today by stitching together separate harnesses that share neither runtime nor scoring, preserving each segment's local validity but losing the shared identity needed to diagnose cross-layer regressions. We present DeepInsight, an evaluation infrastructure that serves this full spectrum on a single runtime. Rather than homogenize the regimes, it preserves their heterogeneity behind three narrow abstractions -- task, resource, and result -- each realized as one invariant shared by every subsystem: one episode driver, one resource-handle protocol implemented by every expensive backend (LLM inference and sandboxed runtimes alike), and one trace identity scheme under which every event is written. Deployed in production across all three layers of an embodied humanoid stack, this single set of invariants onboards new benchmarks largely by configuration. Where mature peer orchestrators exist -- at the foundation-model end -- it reproduces published references and peer-framework readings within their own spread, runs the same suites faster on a single node, and scales near-linearly across nodes. Its distinctive return is diagnostic: because every layer writes into one shared trace, a regression that begins in one layer and surfaces in another stays localizable on that trace -- a cross-layer payoff no federation of per-segment harnesses can reproduce.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.

Builds on

44 of 55 references.

References · 44

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  4. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  5. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
  6. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
  7. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  8. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
  9. 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,080
  10. 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
  11. 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
  12. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
32 more
  1. 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,614
  2. 2024Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysiscited by 1,413
  3. 2023LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learningcited by 1,410
  4. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
  5. 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
  6. 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,204
  7. 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,195
  8. 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
  9. 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,063
  10. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
  11. 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 708
  12. 2019RLBench: The Robot Learning Benchmark & Learning Environmentcited by 689
  13. 2021CALVIN: A Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Policy Learning for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation Taskscited by 584
  14. 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 512
  15. 2025Qwen3-Omni Technical Reportcited by 497
  16. 2023OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 476
  17. 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 455
  18. 2020Beyond the Nav-Graph: Vision-and-Language Navigation in Continuous Environmentscited by 441
  19. 2024Measuring short-form factuality in large language modelscited by 373
  20. 2024LMMs-Eval: Reality Check on the Evaluation of Large Multimodal Modelscited by 353
  21. 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 297
  22. 2023Orbit: A Unified Simulation Framework for Interactive Robot Learning Environmentscited by 295
  23. 2024LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmarkcited by 262
  24. 2024CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMscited by 234
  25. 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Tencited by 198
  26. 2021WenetSpeech: A 10000+ Hours Multi-domain Mandarin Corpus for Speech Recognitioncited by 197
  27. 2024Are We Done with MMLU?cited by 194
  28. 2025WorldSense: Evaluating Real-world Omnimodal Understanding for Multimodal LLMscited by 155
  29. 2024DynaMath: A Dynamic Visual Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Robustness of Vision Language Modelscited by 146
  30. 2024HumanoidBench: Simulated Humanoid Benchmark for Whole-Body Locomotion and Manipulationcited by 112
  31. 2025SimpleVQA: Multimodal Factuality Evaluation for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 66
  32. 2023RoboHive: A Unified Framework for Robot Learningcited by 42

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.