DeepInsight: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure Across the Physical AI Stack
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating a Physical AI stack spans operators that differ by more than three orders of magnitude -- from a single foundation-model decoding step to thousands of physics ticks of whole-body control -- varying orthogonally in modality, reward semantics, and resource profile. No existing framework spans this range, so the stack is evaluated today by stitching together separate harnesses that share neither runtime nor scoring, preserving each segment's local validity but losing the shared identity needed to diagnose cross-layer regressions. We present DeepInsight, an evaluation infrastructure that serves this full spectrum on a single runtime. Rather than homogenize the regimes, it preserves their heterogeneity behind three narrow abstractions -- task, resource, and result -- each realized as one invariant shared by every subsystem: one episode driver, one resource-handle protocol implemented by every expensive backend (LLM inference and sandboxed runtimes alike), and one trace identity scheme under which every event is written. Deployed in production across all three layers of an embodied humanoid stack, this single set of invariants onboards new benchmarks largely by configuration. Where mature peer orchestrators exist -- at the foundation-model end -- it reproduces published references and peer-framework readings within their own spread, runs the same suites faster on a single node, and scales near-linearly across nodes. Its distinctive return is diagnostic: because every layer writes into one shared trace, a regression that begins in one layer and surfaces in another stays localizable on that trace -- a cross-layer payoff no federation of per-segment harnesses can reproduce.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.
Builds on
44 of 55 references.
References · 44
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,789
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,141
- 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,080
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
32 more
- 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,614
- 2024Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysiscited by 1,413
- 2023LIBERO: Benchmarking Knowledge Transfer for Lifelong Robot Learningcited by 1,410
- 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,402
- 2023Instruction-Following Evaluation for Large Language Modelscited by 1,228
- 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,204
- 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,195
- 2023GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistantscited by 1,128
- 2016Modeling Context in Referring Expressionscited by 1,063
- 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 708
- 2019RLBench: The Robot Learning Benchmark & Learning Environmentcited by 689
- 2021CALVIN: A Benchmark for Language-Conditioned Policy Learning for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation Taskscited by 584
- 2024MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmarkcited by 512
- 2025Qwen3-Omni Technical Reportcited by 497
- 2023OCRBench: On the Hidden Mystery of OCR in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 476
- 2024VLMEvalKit: An Open-Source Toolkit for Evaluating Large Multi-Modality Modelscited by 455
- 2020Beyond the Nav-Graph: Vision-and-Language Navigation in Continuous Environmentscited by 441
- 2024Measuring short-form factuality in large language modelscited by 373
- 2024LMMs-Eval: Reality Check on the Evaluation of Large Multimodal Modelscited by 353
- 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 297
- 2023Orbit: A Unified Simulation Framework for Interactive Robot Learning Environmentscited by 295
- 2024LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmarkcited by 262
- 2024CharXiv: Charting Gaps in Realistic Chart Understanding in Multimodal LLMscited by 234
- 2023Teaching CLIP to Count to Tencited by 198
- 2021WenetSpeech: A 10000+ Hours Multi-domain Mandarin Corpus for Speech Recognitioncited by 197
- 2024Are We Done with MMLU?cited by 194
- 2025WorldSense: Evaluating Real-world Omnimodal Understanding for Multimodal LLMscited by 155
- 2024DynaMath: A Dynamic Visual Benchmark for Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning Robustness of Vision Language Modelscited by 146
- 2024HumanoidBench: Simulated Humanoid Benchmark for Whole-Body Locomotion and Manipulationcited by 112
- 2025SimpleVQA: Multimodal Factuality Evaluation for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 66
- 2023RoboHive: A Unified Framework for Robot Learningcited by 42
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.