mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Where Should Action Generation Begin? A Learnable Source Prior for Generative Robot Policies

arXiv 2606.17408 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2026cs.RO cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative robot policies typically begin action generation from an observation-independent standard Gaussian distribution, leaving the choice of source distribution underexplored. This work asks a simple question: where should action generation begin? We propose LeaP, a Learnable source Prior that replaces the standard Gaussian with a proprioception-conditioned diagonal Gaussian over action chunks. Parameterized by a lightweight MLP, LeaP jointly predicts the mean and state-adaptive variance of the source distribution, while keeping the downstream generator architecture and inference solver unchanged. This design provides an observation-informed yet stochastic initialization, allowing the generator to focus on precise action refinement rather than transporting samples from an uninformed noise source. On 15 RoboTwin manipulation tasks, LeaP achieves an average success rate of 81.6%, outperforming four representative baselines -- including deterministic-source methods, a no-prior counterpart, and a diffusion-bridge policy -- by 6.5 to 25.5 percentage points. The same prior consistently improves both flow-matching and diffusion-bridge generators, while using fewer parameters and converging faster. The advantage carries over to real-world deployment, where LeaP attains the best performance. These results suggest that the source distribution is an independent and reusable design axis for generative robot policies, complementary to the choice of generative dynamics.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.

Builds on

35 of 37 references.

References · 35

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  3. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
  4. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  5. 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 6,054
  6. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  7. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
  8. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,700
  9. 2022Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Modelscited by 3,045
  10. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,838
  11. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,407
  12. 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,761
23 more
  1. 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,568
  2. 2025GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robotscited by 1,225
  3. 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
  4. 2025SmolVLA: A Vision-Language-Action Model for Affordable and Efficient Roboticscited by 530
  5. 2025RoboTwin 2.0: A Scalable Data Generator and Benchmark with Strong Domain Randomization for Robust Bimanual Robotic Manipulationcited by 518
  6. 2025Steering Your Diffusion Policy with Latent Space Reinforcement Learningcited by 169
  7. 2024Consistency Policy: Accelerated Visuomotor Policies via Consistency Distillationcited by 166
  8. 2024ReNO: Enhancing One-step Text-to-Image Models through Reward-based Noise Optimizationcited by 119
  9. 2024FlowPolicy: Enabling Fast and Robust 3D Flow-based Policy via Consistency Flow Matching for Robot Manipulationcited by 104
  10. 2023Generating images of rare concepts using pre-trained diffusion modelscited by 79
  11. 2024Learning Robotic Manipulation Policies from Point Clouds with Conditional Flow Matchingcited by 65
  12. 2024Affordance-based Robot Manipulation with Flow Matchingcited by 54
  13. 2024AdaFlow: Imitation Learning with Variance-Adaptive Flow-Based Policiescited by 50
  14. 2024A Noise is Worth Diffusion Guidancecited by 49
  15. 2025ManiFlow: A General Robot Manipulation Policy via Consistency Flow Trainingcited by 49
  16. 2025Streaming Flow Policy: Simplifying diffusion/flow-matching policies by treating action trajectories as flow trajectoriescited by 39
  17. 2025Much Ado About Noising: Dispelling the Myths of Generative Robotic Controlcited by 36
  18. 2025MP1: MeanFlow Tames Policy Learning in 1-step for Robotic Manipulationcited by 35
  19. 2025VITA: Vision-to-Action Flow Matching Policycited by 25
  20. 2023The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis in Denoising: Towards Semantic-Driven Initializationcited by 23
  21. 2025UniDB: A Unified Diffusion Bridge Framework via Stochastic Optimal Controlcited by 20
  22. 2026Action-to-Action Flow Matchingcited by 16
  23. 2025Sample from What You See: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Diffusion Bridge with Observation-Embedded Stochastic Differential Equationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Inference-Time Enhancement of Generative Robot Policies via Predictive World Modeling
  2. 2026You've Got a Golden Ticket: Improving Generative Robot Policies With A Single Noise Vector
  3. 2026WarmPrior: Straightening Flow-Matching Policies with Temporal Priors
  4. 2026Temporal Policy: History-Initialized Action Generation for Robotic Learning from Demonstration
  5. 2026HybridFlow: A 2-NFE Generative Policy for Real-Time Robotic Manipulation
  6. 2026FlowDAgger: Human-in-the-Loop Adaptation of Generative Robot Policies in Latent Space
  7. 2025Masked Generative Policy for Robotic Control
  8. 2024How Generalizable Is My Behavior Cloning Policy? A Statistical Approach to Trustworthy Performance Evaluation