mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Noise-Driven Escape from Metastable Phases explains Grokking in Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2606.17120 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2026cs.LG physics.chem-phcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) exhibit first order phase transitions under variations of the L2 regularization strength, with each transition marking the onset of a new learnable feature. Below a critical regularization strength, all features are in principle learnable, but coexisting metastable states, separated by energy barriers, can trap the network and impede convergence. A strength of DNNs is their ability to generalize. But many open questions remain, among them the origin of so called grokking: the abrupt, delayed onset of generalization after prolonged apparent overfitting. We show for linear DNNs that grokking is consistent with hysteresis in first-order L2 phase transitions: using L2 regularization to engineer deliberate trapping, we demonstrate that a model in a low-accuracy metastable state escapes only when SGD noise drives it across an energy barrier, with escape times following Arrhenius scaling. We reproduce grokking-like delayed convergence across two orders of magnitude in escape time by deliberately trapping models in metastable phases. Using sparse sub-sampling we also reproduce the canonical grokking curve where test error eventually approaches the final training error. Our work suggests that the number of metastable states equals the number of learnable features -- one per singular value of the data covariance -- the potential for hysteresis grows naturally with task complexity. We provide evidence that the same mechanism likely operates in general nonlinear DNNs. Our results provide routes toward more efficient learning schemes.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2026.

Builds on

15 of 24 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
  2. 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
  3. 2022Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasetscited by 599
  4. 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 328
  5. 2017Don't Decay the Learning Rate, Increase the Batch Sizecited by 313
  6. 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent as Approximate Bayesian Inferencecited by 298
  7. 2022Omnigrok: Grokking Beyond Algorithmic Datacited by 142
  8. 2023Dichotomy of Early and Late Phase Implicit Biases Can Provably Induce Grokkingcited by 76
  9. 2023Grokking as a First Order Phase Transition in Two Layer Networkscited by 48
  10. 2021Power-law escape rate of SGDcited by 29
  11. 2023Implicit bias of SGD in L2-regularized linear DNNs: One-way jumps from high to low rankcited by 28
  12. 2023Grokking in Linear Estimators -- A Solvable Model that Groks without Understandingcited by 25
3 more
  1. 2025Provable Scaling Laws of Feature Emergence from Learning Dynamics of Grokkingcited by 14
  2. 2025Is Grokking a Computational Glass Relaxation?cited by 8
  3. 2025Phase transitions reveal hierarchical structure in deep neural networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.