mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Advantage Weighting for Online RL Fine-Tuning of VLAs from Sparse Episode Outcomes

arXiv 2606.17043 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2026cs.RO cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When pretrained VLA policies are fine-tuned through online RL, each rollout episode produces only a single binary outcome (success or failure), yet the actor update requires per-transition supervision. Existing approaches commonly reduce this sparse outcome to a single scalar reward or advantage signal, which conflates distinct forms of transition-level feedback and provides limited guidance once basic task success becomes achievable. First, a single scalar signal conflates the two objectives of viability and efficiency; once basic success is achieved, the binary label provides no gradient to distinguish efficient completions from slow ones. Second, real-world rollouts mix autonomous and intervention segments; naively assigning episode outcomes across these boundaries introduces incorrect credit assignment. To address these issues, we propose Hierarchical Advantage-Weighted Behavior Cloning (HABC), which trains separate critic heads for these two objectives on different data subsets and combines their outputs with a state-adaptive balance. A state-adaptive gate gt merges their one-step advantages, prioritizing viability when success is uncertain and shifting to efficiency only when viability is high, and converts the result into per-transition weights on the actor loss. Intervention-aware credit assignment further restricts outcome labels to segments executed by the current policy, preventing supervision from leaking across intervention boundaries. In real-robot experiments on three contact-rich bimanual tasks, HABC raises success from supervised fine-tuning (SFT) baselines of 36%, 44%, and 12% to 92%, 88%, and 38%.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Many Ways to Succeed: Diversity-Driven RL Fine-Tuning for VLA Generalization
  2. 2026Stable and Efficient Real-World Online VLA Post-Training via Asynchronous Replay-Anchored Policy Improvement
  3. 2026The Low-Rank Structure of VLA Reinforcement Learning
  4. 2026World-VLA-Loop: Closed-Loop Learning of Video World Model and VLA Policy
  5. 2025Refined Policy Distillation: From VLA Generalists to RL Experts
  6. 2026Neglected Free Lunch from Post-training: Progress Advantage for LLM Agents
  7. 2026Learn Where Outcomes Diverge: Efficient VLA RL via Probabilistic Chunk Masking
  8. 2025Reflection-Based Task Adaptation for Self-Improving VLA