mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Graphical conditional generative modeling for digital twin modeling

arXiv 2606.16219 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2026cs.CE cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Digital twin modeling, including control and data assimilation under model uncertainty, often faces an open-ended fidelity problem: adding variables, data streams, and time scales can indefinitely increase model complexity, ultimately producing systems that are difficult to maintain, validate, interpret, and use for stress or safety testing. As an alternative, one can seek parsimonious stochastic surrogate models built only on the variables needed to describe the relevant quantities of interest. We introduce a framework for discovering such variables from observational data by identifying which candidate inputs influence the full conditional law of a target quantity, rather than only its conditional mean. This distinction is essential in stochastic, coarse-grained, or partially observed systems, where dependencies may appear through changes in variability, tail behavior, multimodality, or uncertainty rather than through deterministic functional relationships. The framework couples conditional generative modeling, which learns the conditional distribution of the target given candidate inputs, with Gaussian-process-based analysis of variance (through kernel mode decomposition), which enables iterative pruning of non-influential inputs and interpretable structure discovery. In control settings, the resulting surrogate can be interpreted as a learned Markov decision process: the method identifies not only a transition model, but also the state, action, and memory variables needed to make the learned dynamics effectively Markovian. Across examples involving stochastic dynamical systems, missing variables, PDE control, reinforcement learning, and economic data, the discovered structures yield interpretable stochastic surrogates whose downstream performance is comparable to models trained on the full variable set.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2026.

Builds on

15 of 57 references.

References · 15

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  3. 2023Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusionscited by 939
  4. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning in a Handful of Trials using Probabilistic Dynamics Modelscited by 774
  5. 2019Learning Sparse Nonparametric DAGscited by 207
  6. 2025How to build a consistency model: Learning flow maps via self-distillationcited by 103
  7. 2025Align Your Flow: Scaling Continuous-Time Flow Map Distillationcited by 87
  8. 2019Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablerscited by 81
  9. 2013Causal Networks: Semantics and Expressivenesscited by 67
  10. 2021Learning non-Gaussian graphical models via Hessian scores and triangular transportcited by 16
  11. 2022Learning Stochastic Dynamics with Statistics-Informed Neural Networkcited by 16
  12. 2024Self-Corrected Flow Distillation for Consistent One-Step and Few-Step Text-to-Image Generationcited by 16
3 more
  1. 2025Probabilistic operator learning: generative modeling and uncertainty quantification for foundation models of differential equationscited by 10
  2. 2023Codiscovering graphical structure and functional relationships within data: A Gaussian Process framework for connecting the dotscited by 8
  3. 2018Jointly Robust Prior for Gaussian Stochastic Process in Emulation, Calibration and Variable Selectioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Generative and Nonparametric Approaches for Conditional Distribution Estimation: Methods, Perspectives, and Comparative Evaluations
  2. 2025Bifidelity Parameter Estimation Using Conditional Diffusion Models
  3. 2026Digital Twin AI: Opportunities and Challenges from Large Language Models to World Models
  4. 2026Trajectory Design and Budgeted Querying for Digital Twin Calibration
  5. 2025Position: Foundation Models Need Digital Twin Representations
  6. 2025Beyond Linear Diffusions: Improved Representations for Rare Conditional Generative Modeling
  7. 2024ControlVAR: Exploring Controllable Visual Autoregressive Modeling
  8. 2024Conditional Generative Models are Sufficient to Sample from Any Causal Effect Estimand