Cascaded Sparse Autoencoders Learn Multi-Level Visual Concepts in Multimodal LLMs
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on vision-language tasks, yet their internal visual representations remain difficult to interpret. Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) provide a scalable way to decompose dense model activations into sparse, interpretable features. However, existing SAE architectures primarily recover flat feature dictionaries and are less suited for explicit multi-level concept organization. In this paper, we introduce a cascaded sparse autoencoder architecture, dubbed SAE++, for learning hierarchical visual concepts in MLLMs. Rather than nesting or stacking SAE sparse activation codes, SAE++ trains a second-level SAE directly on the decoder weights of the first-level SAE, treating learned low-level feature directions as inputs for higher-level abstraction. This design enables SAE++ to learn "concepts of concepts" while avoiding drawbacks from the shared-prefix coupling of nesting, Matryoshka-style hierarchies and the bottlenecks of naively stacked SAEs. Experiments across Qwen3-VL, Gemma-3, and LLaVA on multiple visual datasets show that SAE++ improves interpretability in terms of hierarchical concept coherence over state-of-the-art SAE baselines. Results on concept steering further demonstrate that the learned concept groups support effective group-level interventions in MLLM outputs. Code is available at https://github.com/Wang-ML-Lab/sae-plus-plus.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 38 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2026.
Builds on
38 of 47 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025VL-SAE: Interpreting and Enhancing Vision-Language Alignment with a Unified Concept Set24 Oct
- 2025Interpreting the linear structure of vision-language model embedding spaces16 Apr
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Models3 Apr
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning29 Apr
Other references · 34
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
- 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,729
22 more
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,027
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
- 2024DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understandingcited by 733
- 2024Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencoderscited by 553
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
- 2024Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 388
- 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 328
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 300
- 2022Matryoshka Representation Learningcited by 282
- 2023Interpreting CLIP's Image Representation via Text-Based Decompositioncited by 196
- 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnetcited by 191
- 2021Benchmarking Representation Learning for Natural World Image Collectionscited by 168
- 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 143
- 2024BatchTopK Sparse Autoencoderscited by 130
- 2024Visual-RolePlay: Universal Jailbreak Attack on MultiModal Large Language Models via Role-playing Image Charactercited by 68
- 2024Sparse autoencoders reveal selective remapping of visual concepts during adaptationcited by 68
- 2025Interpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoderscited by 60
- 2024Measuring Progress in Dictionary Learning for Language Model Interpretability with Board Game Modelscited by 51
- 2023Self-Interpretable Time Series Prediction with Counterfactual Explanationscited by 24
- 2025SAE-V: Interpreting Multimodal Models for Enhanced Alignmentcited by 23
- 2024Probabilistic Conceptual Explainers: Trustworthy Conceptual Explanations for Vision Foundation Modelscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Extraction and Analysis of Multimodal Concepts in Vision Language Models through Sparse Autoencoders
- 2026When Structured Sparse Autoencoders Learn Consistent Concepts Across Modalities
- 2025Line of Sight: On Linear Representations in VLLMs
- 2026Sparse Shortcuts: Facilitating Efficient Fusion in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Universal Sparse Autoencoders: Interpretable Cross-Model Concept Alignment
- 2025Probing the Representational Power of Sparse Autoencoders in Vision Models
- 2026Steering Vision-Language Models with Joint Sparse Autoencoders
- 2025SparseMM: Head Sparsity Emerges from Visual Concept Responses in MLLMs