GRACE-DS: a Guarded Reward-guided Agent Correction Environment in Data Science
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Web, search, and research agents
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce GRACE-DS, a Guarded Reward-guided Agent Correction Environment in Data Science for pre-deployment evaluation of LLM-powered AutoML agents. GRACE-DS is a set of evaluation metrics in an isolated environment that can be applied to tabular ML tasks specific to a particular organization. It exposes agents to realistic workflow stages, from planning and data inspection through feature engineering, model development, validation, and code repair to final submission, while hidden executable validators measure not only final predictive performance but also leakage avoidance, reproducibility, protocol validity, correction behavior, and reward alignment. The strongest structured regime, flexible iterative interaction (our approach), achieves higher end-to-end normalized hidden-test quality than single-shot generation, unstructured interaction, and restart-based baselines, while also improving protocol-valid completion. Validated across more than 7,000 episodes, these results establish GRACE-DS as a robust platform for assessing the capacity of LLM-based AutoML agents to execute machine learning workflows under production-like conditions and in accordance with organization-specific requirements.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Web, search, and research agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.
Builds on
17 of 37 references.
Closest ancestors · 13
Same direction, newest first
- 2026TML-Bench: Benchmark for Data Science Agents on Tabular ML Tasks5 Mar
- 2026DSGym: A Holistic Framework for Evaluating and Training Data Science Agents22 Jan
- 2025DABstep: Data Agent Benchmark for Multi-step Reasoning30 Jun
- 2025MLE-Dojo: Interactive Environments for Empowering LLM Agents in Machine Learning Engineering12 May
- 2025MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents20 Feb
- 2025DataSciBench: An LLM Agent Benchmark for Data Science19 Feb
- 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering9 Oct
- 2024ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discovery7 Oct
- 2024DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts?12 Sep
- 2024BLADE: Benchmarking Language Model Agents for Data-Driven Science19 Aug
- 2024InsightBench: Evaluating Business Analytics Agents Through Multi-Step Insight Generation8 Jul
- 2024InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis Tasks10 Jan
Other references · 4
- 2022DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 442
- 2025AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Codecited by 206
- 2022Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecturecited by 126
- 2025IDA-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Interactive Guided Data Analysiscited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026RewardHackingAgents: Benchmarking Evaluation Integrity for LLM ML-Engineering Agents
- 2026RSIBench-Data: Benchmarking Data-Centric Research for Recursive Self-Improvement
- 2026DS-Lighting: Making Agent Harnesses Explicit for Data-Science Automation
- 2026DeltaML-Bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Real-World Research Repositories
- 2026BenchShield: Formal Model-Backed Instrumentation for Reward Integrity in LLM-Agent Evaluation Infrastructure
- 2026AgentHPOBench: A Benchmark For Evaluating LLM Agents as Sequential Hyperparameter Optimizers
- 2026LLM-as-a-Verifier: A General-Purpose Verification Framework
- 2026AEMA: Verifiable Evaluation Framework for Trustworthy and Controlled Agentic LLM Systems