mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

You Don't Need Strong Assumptions: Visual Representation Learning via Temporal Differences

arXiv 2606.15956 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Progress in AI has largely been driven by methods that assume less. As compute and data increase, approaches with weaker inductive biases generally outperform those with stronger assumptions. This is particularly characteristic of the field of Visual Representation Learning, where approaches have gone from being dominated by Supervised Learning, to Weakly Supervised Learning, to the now widespread success of Self-Supervised Learning without human labels. Yet, even modern Self-Supervised Learning approaches still depend on strong inductive biases such as augmentations, masking, or cropping. If this trend holds, even these remaining biases should become bottlenecks at scale -- and our experiments confirm this: the optimal strength of inductive biases decreases as data grows. This motivates the search for approaches that rely on fewer assumptions. To this end, we introduce Temporal Difference in Vision (TDV), a new paradigm for self-supervised learning from video that avoids existing inductive biases, relying instead on a causal assumption that the past causes the future. TDV functions by jointly training an image encoder and a motion encoder so that the current frame's representation plus the encoded motion equals the next frame's representation. Despite not leveraging any strong inductive biases, TDV matches state-of-the-art recipes on dense spatial tasks, laying the foundation for representation learning without strong assumptions.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.

Builds on

59 of 85 references.

References · 59

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  5. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  6. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  7. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  8. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  9. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  10. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  11. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  12. 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 6,054
38 more
  1. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  2. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
  3. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
  4. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  5. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  6. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
  7. 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,333
  8. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
  9. 2021Barlow Twins: Self-Supervised Learning via Redundancy Reductioncited by 1,838
  10. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,591
  11. 2021Ego4D: Around the World in 3,000 Hours of Egocentric Videocited by 1,556
  12. 2018World Modelscited by 1,513
  13. 2025DINOv3cited by 1,414
  14. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,382
  15. 2018Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understandingcited by 1,271
  16. 2016Colorful Image Colorizationcited by 1,114
  17. 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,103
  18. 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,068
  19. 2015FlowNet: Learning Optical Flow with Convolutional Networkscited by 1,059
  20. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  21. 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 1,039
  22. 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 903
  23. 2015A Large Dataset to Train Convolutional Networks for Disparity, Optical Flow, and Scene Flow Estimationcited by 881
  24. 2016Pixel Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 816
  25. 2025V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planningcited by 809
  26. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 808
  27. 2024Genie: Generative Interactive Environmentscited by 747
  28. 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Videocited by 531
  29. 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 312
  30. 2026LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixelscited by 273
  31. 2025LeJEPA: Provable and Scalable Self-Supervised Learning Without the Heuristicscited by 254
  32. 2020What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learningcited by 226
  33. 2020TDN: Temporal Difference Networks for Efficient Action Recognitioncited by 183
  34. 2019Video Representation Learning by Dense Predictive Codingcited by 175
  35. 2022CroCo v2: Improved Cross-view Completion Pre-training for Stereo Matching and Optical Flowcited by 166
  36. 2020Demystifying Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning: Invariances, Augmentations and Dataset Biasescited by 143
  37. 2021Broaden Your Views for Self-Supervised Video Learningcited by 108
  38. 2023MC-JEPA: A Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture for Self-Supervised Learning of Motion and Content Featurescited by 57

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.