Intelligent Multimodal Retrieval and Reasoning for Geospatial Knowledge Discovery on the I-GUIDE Platform
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Geospatial knowledge discovery increasingly requires search across heterogeneous artifacts: datasets, maps, notebooks, software, publications, and the provenance links among them. Conventional geoportals support metadata and spatial filtering, but they rarely provide semantic retrieval, graph-aware provenance traversal, and conversational synthesis in one integrated system. This paper presents I-GUIDE Smart Search, a production multimodal geospatial retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system embedded in the I-GUIDE Platform, and reports on its design, deployment, and evaluation. The system combines production-maintained OpenSearch keyword, vector, and spatial indexes with a Neo4j knowledge graph and an iterative RAG pipeline for memory-aware query augmentation, reasoning, retrieval-method routing, relevance grading, grounded generation, hallucination and relevance checking. In a single-A100 RAG deployment, I-GUIDE Smart Search supports interactive use up to about 100 concurrent simulated users, reaching 4.4 requests per second with p50 latency near 25 seconds despite 20-50 LLM calls per query. For answer quality, we evaluate a four-category benchmark of 170 unique human-filtered user-facing queries, together with ten intent-specific probe sets generated from the deployed indexes and graph. Smart Search improves retrieved evidence coverage and judged answer quality over non-retrieval and naive-RAG baselines, with the clearest gains on exact-identifier, spatially constrained, simple-recommendation, and domain-specific factual queries requiring current indexed evidence. We distill transferable deployment lessons for spatial RAG systems, covering spatial metadata quality, graph provenance, retrieval routing, interface contracts, refusal-aware evaluation, latency-cost tradeoffs, and the role of the user interface in deployed geospatial cyberinfrastructure.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 5 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2026.
Builds on
5 of 32 references.
References · 5
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
- 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Towards Intelligent Geospatial Data Discovery: a knowledge graph-driven multi-agent framework powered by large language models
- 2025Spatial-RAG: Spatial Retrieval Augmented Generation for Real-World Geospatial Reasoning Questions
- 2025RAG-Anything: All-in-One RAG Framework
- 2025Remote Sensing Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Bridging Remote Sensing Imagery and Comprehensive Knowledge with a Multi-Modal Dataset and Retrieval-Augmented Generation Model
- 2025Spatially-Enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Walkability and Urban Discovery
- 2025RAG for Geoscience: What We Expect, Gaps and Opportunities
- 2026GeoMMBench and GeoMMAgent: Toward Expert-Level Multimodal Intelligence in Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- 2025Towards a Barrier-free GeoQA Portal: Natural Language Interaction with Geospatial Data Using Multi-Agent LLMs and Semantic Search