mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Forced Deferral: Manipulating Routing Decisions in Multimodal LLM Cascades

arXiv 2606.15308 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

While multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong visual reasoning abilities, serving a large model for every query is computationally expensive. MLLM cascades mitigate this cost by first querying a weak but cheaper model and deferring to a strong model when the weak model's output is unconfident. However, since the weak model's confidence directly controls compute allocation, these systems expose a new attack surface: an adversary can manipulate confidence so that their queries are consistently deferred to the strong model. Motivated by this vulnerability, we introduce the Forced Deferral Attack (FDA), an adversarial image attack that lowers the weak model's confidence and causes cascades to route queries to the strong model. FDA learns a universal border trigger by optimizing a temperature-flattened objective. This objective pushes the weak model's token distribution on triggered inputs toward less concentrated targets constructed from its clean responses. Across datasets, model families, and deferral metrics, FDA consistently increases strong-model routing while outperforming image-perturbation and prompt-injection baselines. These results show that MLLM cascades are vulnerable to attacks that manipulate compute allocation, forcing unintended strong-model usage without directly targeting answer correctness.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 29 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2026.

Builds on

29 of 30 references.

References · 29

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  4. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
  5. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,498
  6. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?cited by 2,105
  7. 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,044
  8. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,881
  9. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
  10. 2023Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,696
  11. 2020DocVQA: A Dataset for VQA on Document Imagescited by 1,288
  12. 2023FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performancecited by 791
17 more
  1. 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 788
  2. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 774
  3. 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 633
  4. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  5. 2024Hybrid LLM: Cost-Efficient and Quality-Aware Query Routingcited by 354
  6. 2023Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 307
  7. 2023Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Modelscited by 286
  8. 2023On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 281
  9. 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 210
  10. 2023On the Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Modal Foundation Modelscited by 142
  11. 2023Large Language Model Cascades with Mixture of Thoughts Representations for Cost-efficient Reasoningcited by 140
  12. 2023AutoMix: Automatically Mixing Language Modelscited by 116
  13. 2024Language Model Cascades: Token-level uncertainty and beyondcited by 115
  14. 2024Factual Confidence of LLMs: on Reliability and Robustness of Current Estimatorscited by 59
  15. 2025Rerouting LLM Routerscited by 11
  16. 2025Life-Cycle Routing Vulnerabilities of LLM Routercited by 10
  17. 2025Phi: Preference Hijacking in Multi-modal Large Language Models at Inference Timecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Con Instruction: Universal Jailbreaking of Multimodal Large Language Models via Non-Textual Modalities
  2. 2026VALD: Multi-Stage Vision Attack Detection for Efficient LVLM Defense
  3. 2026Adversarial Attacks on Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
  4. 2024A Survey of Attacks on Large Vision-Language Models: Resources, Advances, and Future Trends
  5. 2023On the Robustness of Large Multimodal Models Against Image Adversarial Attacks
  6. 2026Render Before Reading: Visual Rendering as a Prompt Injection Defense
  7. 2025Semantic Router: On the Feasibility of Hijacking MLLMs via a Single Adversarial Perturbation
  8. 2025Adversarial Confusion Attack: Disrupting Multimodal Large Language Models