mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CREST: Deployment-Realistic Hardware-in-the-Loop NAS for Embedded Sensing Systems

arXiv 2606.15004 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2026eess.SY cs.LG cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deploying neural networks on low-power microcontrollers (MCUs) requires selecting model architectures under tight memory, latency, and energy constraints. Existing workflows often simplify this process along one or more axes: static proxy costs such as FLOPs or parameters, treating one MCU as representative, and continuous-inference tests instead of deployed sensing schedules. These assumptions can mis-rank Pareto-front candidates, miss infeasible deployments, and obscure schedule-dependent energy. We present CREST (Cross-platform Runtime Evaluation and Search Tool), a deployment-realistic hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) neural architecture search (NAS) framework for MCU sensing systems. CREST keeps the optimizer, HIL measurement boundary, logging, and replay workflow fixed while exposing workload, model family, target backend, schedule, quantization, and scoring policy as configurable axes. This makes deployment effects experimentally separable within one reusable workflow. We evaluate CREST on inertial odometry and audio classification across three Arm Cortex-M targets. For inertial odometry, measured-energy HIL search reduces median per-inference energy by 41.7% versus FLOPs-based selection and 40.8% versus memory-traffic-based selection at similar error. FLOPs-based selection also chooses infeasible deployments on memory-constrained targets. On the STM32 N657 target, continuous-inference and duty-cycled searches produce different Pareto frontiers. For audio classification, the same application-level policy selects different DS-CNN architectures on different boards, and cross-board replay changes deployment cost substantially. Overall, CREST shows that deployment-realistic MCU NAS must jointly optimize model architecture, target platform, runtime schedule, and deployment policy rather than relying only on static proxy costs or continuous-inference measurements.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.

Builds on

14 of 45 references.

References · 14

  1. 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,136
  2. 2020MCUNet: Tiny Deep Learning on IoT Devicescited by 273
  3. 2018CMSIS-NN: Efficient Neural Network Kernels for Arm Cortex-M CPUscited by 121
  4. 2017Hello Edge: Keyword Spotting on Microcontrollerscited by 110
  5. 2021HW-NAS-Bench:Hardware-Aware Neural Architecture Search Benchmarkcited by 84
  6. 2020μNAS: Constrained Neural Architecture Search for Microcontrollerscited by 55
  7. 2022Edge Impulse: An MLOps Platform for Tiny Machine Learningcited by 24
  8. 2021Measuring what Really Matters: Optimizing Neural Networks for TinyMLcited by 8
  9. 2023MLonMCU: TinyML Benchmarking with Fast Retargetingcited by 5
  10. 2024MONAS: Efficient Zero-Shot Neural Architecture Search for MCUscited by 4
  11. 2025Benchmarking Energy and Latency in TinyML: A Novel Method for Resource-Constrained AIcited by 4
  12. 2018Not All Ops Are Created Equal!cited by 3
2 more
  1. 2025End-to-End Efficiency in Keyword Spotting: A System-Level Approach for Embedded Microcontrollerscited by 3
  2. 2026InstMeter: An Instruction-Level Method to Predict Energy and Latency of DL Model Inference on MCUscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Embedded Arena: Iterative Optimization via Hardware Feedback
  2. 2026Embedded Machine Learning for Microcontroller-Class Edge Devices: Data, Feature, Evaluation, and Deployment Pipelines
  3. 2025Evaluating the Energy Efficiency of NPU-Accelerated Machine Learning Inference on Embedded Microcontrollers
  4. 2026PrototypeNAS: Rapid Design of Deep Neural Networks for Microcontroller Units
  5. 2026Efficient Network Inference via Hardware-Aware Architecture Search, Model Pruning & Quantization
  6. 2025On-Sensor Convolutional Neural Networks with Early-Exits
  7. 2024Machine Learning In-Sensors: Computation-enabled Intelligent Sensors For Next Generation of IoT
  8. 2026SNAC-Pack 2.0: Scaled-Out Surrogate Neural Architecture Codesign