GRAPE: Guided Parameter-Space Evolution for Compact Adversarial Robustness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial Training (AT) improves neural network robustness, but most methods train a fixed parameter space from the start. This paper asks whether the order in which parameters become optimizable can affect the final robust solution, even when the final architecture or computation budget is controlled. We propose GRAPE, Guided Parameter-Space Evolution, a training framework for compact adversarial robustness. GRAPE combines parameter-space stabilization with progressive hidden expansion: it stabilizes robust optimization in the currently exposed space, gradually releases new optimizable dimensions, and uses an adversarial spectral utilization score to guide newly released capacity toward high-pressure modules. In contrast to fixed-structure AT, GRAPE treats robust model learning as a process of progressive parameter-space exposure and evolution. Under the standard ℓ_∞ threat model on CIFAR-10, with fixed-structure ResNet-18 AT as a controlled reference, GRAPE improves PGD-20 robust accuracy from 51.70% to 56.94% at a nearly matched computation budget with a FLOPs ratio of 1.009x, while reducing parameter count by about 21.4%. A sequential grow variant with the same final ResNet-18 architecture reaches 56.52% PGD-20 robust accuracy, indicating that the gain is not only due to final architecture differences but also to the parameter-space exposure path. These results suggest that guided parameter-space evolution can yield compact and robust parameter configurations under matched computation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.
Builds on
17 of 25 references.
References · 17
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,013
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
- 2015Net2Net: Accelerating Learning via Knowledge Transfercited by 245
- 2021Fixing Data Augmentation to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 201
- 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
- 2021Exploring Architectural Ingredients of Adversarially Robust Deep Neural Networkscited by 73
- 2016Network Morphismcited by 63
5 more
- 2024Adversarial Robustness Limits via Scaling-Law and Human-Alignment Studiescited by 38
- 2022When, where, and how to add new neurons to ANNscited by 18
- 2022Pruning Adversarially Robust Neural Networks without Adversarial Examplescited by 12
- 2024Adversarial Pruning: A Survey and Benchmark of Pruning Methods for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 10
- 2023Improved Adversarial Training Through Adaptive Instance-wise Loss Smoothingcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.