Non-Parametric Machine Text Detection via Multi-View Gaussian Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial conditions such as paraphrasing and targeted style transfer sharply degrade the accuracy of machine text detectors. A document, however, carries multiple complementary signals (e.g., stylistic features, likelihood and rank-order features, and structural features), and an attack that suppresses one may leave others intact. While a parametric classifier can learn to combine these features given sufficient supervision, classifiers are prone to making confidently incorrect predictions when the distribution shifts (e.g., novel attacks or unseen language models). To address this, we propose a multi-view, non-parametric detection framework that extracts complementary feature views from the same document and aggregates per-view evidence through a Gaussian process ensemble. By aggregating evidence across views, an adversary must simultaneously defeat multiple independent axes of detection, substantially raising the cost of evasion. The Gaussian process formulation additionally provides calibrated probabilities and principled abstention on out-of-distribution inputs, supporting reliable deployment in high-stakes settings. We evaluate on three benchmarks spanning diverse generators and attacks: the DetectRL and RAID benchmarks, and the PAN2025 shared task and demonstrate that our multi-view detector maintains strong performance under the considered attacks, outperforming existing approaches against held out attacks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2026.
Builds on
25 of 39 references.
References · 25
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2023The Falcon Series of Open Language Modelscited by 535
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 513
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defensecited by 429
- 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
- 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
- 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 261
13 more
- 2014Scalable Variational Gaussian Process Classificationcited by 228
- 2023DetectLLM: Leveraging Log Rank Information for Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 210
- 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 190
- 2024RAID: A Shared Benchmark for Robust Evaluation of Machine-Generated Text Detectorscited by 163
- 2023MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the Wildcited by 132
- 2023Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 61
- 2024Few-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text using Style Representationscited by 40
- 2024Technical Report on the Pangram AI-Generated Text Classifiercited by 34
- 2024Beemo: Benchmark of Expert-edited Machine-generated Outputscited by 27
- 2025EditLens: Quantifying the Extent of AI Editing in Textcited by 26
- 2014Binary Classifier Calibration: Non-parametric approachcited by 13
- 2025Limits of LLM Text Detectors in Educationcited by 5
- 2025Few-Shot Speech Deepfake Detection Adaptation with Gaussian Processescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.