Mod-Guide: An LLM-based Content Moderation Feedback System to Address Insensitive Speech toward Indigenous Ethnic and Religious Minority Communities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Language operates as a mechanism of both marginalization and resistance, especially for minority communities navigating insensitive and harmful speech online. As content moderation increasingly depends on large language models (LLMs), concerns arise about whether these systems can recognize culturally insensitive speech-language that disregards or marginalizes the cultural and religious perspectives of historically underrepresented communities, often through implicit erasure, misrepresentation, or normative framing, rather than overt hostility. Focusing on Bangladesh's Hindu and Chakma communities -- the country's largest religious and Indigenous ethnic minorities, respectively -- this paper investigates the epistemic limits of LLM-based moderation systems and explores methods for incorporating minority perspectives. We co-created a culturally grounded corpus of insensitive speech with community members and integrated their narratives into moderation pipelines using retrieval augmented generation (RAG). Our tool, Mod-Guide, improves LLM sensitivity to minority viewpoints by leveraging contextual cues derived from lived experience. Through mixed-method evaluations involving both minority and majority participants, we demonstrate that RAG-enhanced moderation responses are more contextually accurate and perceived differently across ethnic lines. This work advances research in human-computer interaction, AI ethics, and social computing by foregrounding restorative justice and hermeneutical inclusion in the design of content moderation systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 109 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.
Builds on
29 of 109 references.
References · 29
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
- 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
- 2023REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Modelscited by 786
- 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 307
- 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 257
- 2023Auditing large language models: a three-layered approachcited by 135
- 2021Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemscited by 124
- 2020Human-centered Explainable AI: Towards a Reflective Sociotechnical Approachcited by 90
- 2020Hate Speech Detection and Racial Bias Mitigation in Social Media based on BERT modelcited by 87
- 2024Evaluating Cultural Adaptability of a Large Language Model via Simulation of Synthetic Personascited by 36
- 2023ChatGPT Perpetuates Gender Bias in Machine Translation and Ignores Non-Gendered Pronouns: Findings across Bengali and Five other Low-Resource Languagescited by 33
17 more
- 2023'Person' == Light-skinned, Western Man, and Sexualization of Women of Color: Stereotypes in Stable Diffusioncited by 33
- 2024Identifying Implicit Social Biases in Vision-Language Modelscited by 27
- 2024Do Generative AI Models Output Harm while Representing Non-Western Cultures: Evidence from A Community-Centered Approachcited by 25
- 2021A Framework of Severity for Harmful Content Onlinecited by 22
- 2021Problematic Machine Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review of Algorithm Auditscited by 20
- 2024The "Colonial Impulse" of Natural Language Processing: An Audit of Bengali Sentiment Analysis Tools and Their Identity-based Biasescited by 16
- 2022A Trade-off-centered Framework of Content Moderationcited by 11
- 2024Interpretations, Representations, and Stereotypes of Caste within Text-to-Image Generatorscited by 10
- 2024Your Large Language Model is Secretly a Fairness Proponent and You Should Prompt it Like Onecited by 9
- 2022Designing Word Filter Tools for Creator-led Comment Moderationcited by 7
- 2022Data-Efficient Autoregressive Document Retrieval for Fact Verificationcited by 6
- 2024Socio-Culturally Aware Evaluation Framework for LLM-Based Content Moderationcited by 5
- 2022Addressing interpersonal harm in online gaming communities: the opportunities and challenges for a restorative justice approachcited by 3
- 2024Watching the Watchers: A Comparative Fairness Audit of Cloud-based Content Moderation Servicescited by 3
- 2024The Politics of Fear and the Experience of Bangladeshi Religious Minority Communities Using Social Media Platformscited by 2
- 2024A Civics-oriented Approach to Understanding Intersectionally Marginalized Users' Experience with Hate Speech Onlinecited by 1
- 2025Characterizing Network Structure of Anti-Trans Actors on TikTokcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025LLM-C3MOD: A Human-LLM Collaborative System for Cross-Cultural Hate Speech Moderation
- 2026Mind the Gap: Pitfalls of LLM Alignment with Asian Public Opinion
- 2024Recent Advances in Hate Speech Moderation: Multimodality and the Role of Large Models
- 2025Surfacing Subtle Stereotypes: A Multilingual, Debate-Oriented Evaluation of Modern LLMs
- 2025BengaliMoralBench: A Benchmark for Auditing Moral Reasoning in Large Language Models within Bengali Language and Culture
- 2026Understanding Cultural Alignment in Multilingual LLMs via Natural Debate Statements ↗
- 2026BanglaSocialBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Sociopragmatic and Cultural Alignment of LLMs in Bangladeshi Social Interaction
- 2025Confident, Calibrated, or Complicit: Safety Alignment and Ideological Bias in LLM Hate Speech Detection