ReSET: Accurate Latency-Critical NVFP4 Reasoning via Step-Aware Temperature Scaling
On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking
Abstract (arXiv)
Large reasoning models (LRMs) improve complex problem-solving by generating long intermediate reasoning traces, but this substantially increases inference costs. NVFP4 inference offers a promising approach to reduce both computational and memory costs through hardware-supported low-precision execution. However, directly applying NVFP4 to LRMs introduces two practical limitations: reasoning accuracy degrades under quantization, and existing NVFP4 kernels do not fully realize latency benefits in small-batch autoregressive decoding. In this work, we analyze the effect of NVFP4 quantization on token-level uncertainty during reasoning. We show that quantization increases incorrect sampling at low-entropy symbolic tokens, while causing over-concentration on a small set of tokens in high-uncertainty reasoning steps. Based on this observation, we propose ReSET, a reasoning-step entropy-based temperature-scaling method that estimates step-level uncertainty online and adapts the decoding temperature using both token-level and step-level entropy signals. To address the latency gap, we further design a CUDA-core small-M NVFP4 kernel for latency-critical autoregressive decoding. Across reasoning benchmarks and model scales, ReSET improves NVFP4 reasoning accuracy by up to ~!2 points over the NVFP4 baseline. Our CUDA-core small-M kernel further improves latency-critical decoding, delivering up to 2.5!× kernel-level speedup over NVFP4 vLLM and approximately 2!× end-to-end decoding speedup over BF16. Code is available at https://github.com/aiha-lab/ReSET.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.
Builds on
11 of 38 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2026What Makes Low-Bit Quantization-Aware Training Work for Reasoning LLMs? A Systematic Study21 Jan
- 2025On the Role of Temperature Sampling in Test-Time Scaling2 Oct
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card8 Aug
Other references · 8
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
- 2025OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Modelscited by 287
- 2023Microscaling Data Formats for Deep Learningcited by 132
- 2025Four Over Six: More Accurate NVFP4 Quantization with Adaptive Block Scalingcited by 29
- 2025Block Rotation is All You Need for MXFP4 Quantizationcited by 18
- 2026DuQuant++: Fine-grained Rotation Enhances Microscaling FP4 Quantizationcited by 8
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026ReQAT: Achieving Full-Precision Reasoning Accuracy with 4-bit Floating-Point Quantization-Aware Training
- 2026Reasoning-Aware Compression: Identifying and Protecting Vulnerable Reasoning Circuits for Energy-Efficient LLM Deployment
- 2026BitCal-TTS: Bit-Calibrated Test-Time Scaling for Quantized Reasoning Models
- 2025Not All Bits Are Equal: Scale-Dependent Memory Optimization Strategies for Reasoning Models
- 2025Think Just Enough: Sequence-Level Entropy as a Confidence Signal for LLM Reasoning
- 2026LAQuant: A Simple Overhead-free Large Reasoning Model Quantization by Layer-wise Lookahead Loss
- 2026Extreme Low-Bit Inference in Reasoning Models: Failure Modes and Targeted Recovery
- 2025Entropy-Guided Loop: Achieving Reasoning through Uncertainty-Aware Generation