mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PolyAlign: Conditional Human-Distribution Alignment

arXiv 2606.13227 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Post-training methods such as supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and preference optimization typically align language models toward a single global assistant behavior. While effective for improving average helpfulness, this can suppress the natural variation of human responses across languages, tasks, and dialogue settings. We study this problem as conditional human-distribution alignment: models should match the human response distribution appropriate to the current interaction context, rather than a universal response style. We introduce PolyAlign, a distribution-aware alignment framework that organizes bilingual interaction data into bucket-specific human reference distributions defined by language, interaction track, response family, and length. PolyAlign combines Bucket-Aware SFT, which balances optimization across heterogeneous buckets, with Human-Distribution Preference Optimization (HDPO), which regularizes preference learning using critic-estimated distance to bucket-specific human support. Across a bilingual evaluation suite covering English and Chinese single- and multi-turn settings, PolyAlign improves conditional naturalness and distributional faithfulness while preserving competitive task utility. The results suggest that post-training should move beyond global alignment objectives toward interaction-aware alignment with human response distributions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 33 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

Builds on

33 of 42 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  2. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model12 Mar
  3. 2023On Diversified Preferences of Large Language Model Alignment12 Dec
  4. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment18 May
  5. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment14 Apr
  6. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions20 Dec
  7. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 26

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  3. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  4. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  6. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  7. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  8. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,588
  9. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 799
  10. 2018MultiWOZ -- A Large-Scale Multi-Domain Wizard-of-Oz Dataset for Task-Oriented Dialogue Modellingcited by 766
  11. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 762
  12. 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 683
14 more
  1. 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 652
  2. 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 575
  3. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 481
  4. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 470
  5. 2020GeDi: Generative Discriminator Guided Sequence Generationcited by 378
  6. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 376
  7. 2023Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability Curvaturecited by 287
  8. 2024Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 263
  9. 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 247
  10. 2024HelpSteer2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward modelscited by 236
  11. 2023RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial Learningcited by 190
  12. 2023SteerLM: Attribute Conditioned SFT as an (User-Steerable) Alternative to RLHFcited by 111
  13. 2018A Span-Extraction Dataset for Chinese Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 84
  14. 2018DRCD: a Chinese Machine Reading Comprehension Datasetcited by 57

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Leveraging Robust Optimization for LLM Alignment under Distribution Shifts
  2. 2026HAL: Inducing Human-likeness in LLMs with Alignment
  3. 2024Understanding the Learning Dynamics of Alignment with Human Feedback
  4. 2023Preference Ranking Optimization for Human Alignment
  5. 2025P-Aligner: Enabling Pre-Alignment of Language Models via Principled Instruction Synthesis
  6. 2026Preference Data Selection for Mitigating the Alignment Tax in Large Language Models
  7. 2023Aligning Language Models with Offline Learning from Human Feedback
  8. 2023CycleAlign: Iterative Distillation from Black-box LLM to White-box Models for Better Human Alignment