mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Context-Aware Dataset for Stance Detection in Bioethical Controversies on Reddit

arXiv 2606.13187 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bioethical debates increasingly unfold on social media, yet stance detection research lacks large-scale, domain-specific resources for modeling such context-dependent discourse. We present BioStance, a context-aware dataset of 39,600 annotated Post-Comment pairs from Reddit bioethical discussions. BioStance covers six controversial targets across three dimensions of bioethical controversy: fundamental value conflicts, individual liberty versus collective responsibility, and technological uncertainty. Each instance preserves hierarchical conversational context and is labeled by three independent annotators using a three-class stance scheme: Favor, Against, and None. The annotations achieve a mean Krippendorff's α of 0.82, indicating substantial reliability. By combining thematic diversity, conversational structure, and high-quality human annotation, BioStance supports research on context-aware stance detection, argument mining, and computational analysis of bioethical discourse.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2026.

Builds on

5 of 38 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  2. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
  3. 2016Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discoursecited by 69
  4. 2024A Challenge Dataset and Effective Models for Conversational Stance Detectioncited by 17
  5. 2024Multimodal Multi-turn Conversation Stance Detection: A Challenge Dataset and Effective Modelcited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.