mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Attack Success Rate: Examining Trigger Leakage in Vision-Language Agentic Systems

arXiv 2606.12586 ↗First posted 10 Jun 2026cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language Agentic Systems (VLAS) connect visual perception to planning, tool use, and physical actions. This means backdoor-type triggers can propagate through both decision pipelines and their connected interfaces, thus making visual backdoors a system-level threat. Current evaluations on such backdoors focus on clean accuracy and attack success rate (ASR), metrics that capture whether a trigger works, but not whether an attack is actually "precise" -- i.e. whether it triggers hidden behaviors only when intended. In this work, we formalize the failure of trigger precision as "trigger leakage": inputs that are visually or semantically close to the intended trigger and therefore inadvertently activate the attacker-specified behavior. To quantify this leakage, we introduce Neighbor Leakage Rate (NLR). Our experiments show that at a 3% poisoning ratio, icon and text triggers remain robust to common visual transformations, but their neighboring variants leak heavily, with NLR reaching 0.996 (icon) and 0.944 (text). Using textual triggers as a controlled probe, we show that standard fine-tuning learns a broad activation region rather than an exact trigger condition, causing neighboring strings to invoke the malicious behavior even when the exact trigger is absent. Adding edit-distance-one hard-negative samples during training substantially narrows this activation region and reduces leakage, including in image-editing and embodied-manipulation workflows, where leaked triggers can propagate into executable programs and action sequences.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 20 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 24 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  2. 2022InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructionscited by 2,611
  3. 2023InternVL: Scaling up Vision Foundation Models and Aligning for Generic Visual-Linguistic Taskscited by 2,565
  4. 2016Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,516
  5. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
  6. 2023DriveLM: Driving with Graph Visual Question Answeringcited by 536
  7. 2022Visual Programming: Compositional visual reasoning without trainingcited by 516
  8. 2024DriveVLM: The Convergence of Autonomous Driving and Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 490
  9. 2020Invisible Backdoor Attack with Sample-Specific Triggerscited by 353
  10. 2020Input-Aware Dynamic Backdoor Attackcited by 313
  11. 2020Backdoor Attacks Against Deep Learning Systems in the Physical Worldcited by 134
  12. 2025Gemini Robotics 1.5: Pushing the Frontier of Generalist Robots with Advanced Embodied Reasoning, Thinking, and Motion Transfercited by 87
8 more
  1. 2025Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotics: A Review Towards Real-World Applicationscited by 84
  2. 2023VLATTACK: Multimodal Adversarial Attacks on Vision-Language Tasks via Pre-trained Modelscited by 68
  3. 2024Multimodal Situational Safetycited by 58
  4. 2024Revisiting Backdoor Attacks against Large Vision-Language Models from Domain Shiftcited by 49
  5. 2025UAVs Meet LLMs: Overviews and Perspectives Toward Agentic Low-Altitude Mobilitycited by 49
  6. 2024Test-Time Backdoor Attacks on Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 40
  7. 2023Agent as Cerebrum, Controller as Cerebellum: Implementing an Embodied LMM-based Agent on Dronescited by 9
  8. 2025BEAT: Visual Backdoor Attacks on VLM-based Embodied Agents via Contrastive Trigger Learningcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025DropVLA: An Action-Level Backdoor Attack on Vision-Language-Action Models
  2. 2025Chain-of-Trigger: An Agentic Backdoor that Paradoxically Enhances Agentic Robustness
  3. 2026TMT: Runtime Backdoor Detection for Vision-Language-Action Policies on Unseen Tasks
  4. 2026Inject Once Survive Later: Backdooring Vision-Language-Action Models to Persist Through Downstream Fine-tuning
  5. 2026State Backdoor: Towards Stealthy Real-world Poisoning Attack on Vision-Language-Action Model in State Space
  6. 2025AttackVLA: Benchmarking Adversarial and Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language-Action Models
  7. 2026FlowHijack: A Dynamics-Aware Backdoor Attack on Flow-Matching Vision-Language-Action Models
  8. 2026Backdoor Directions in Vision Transformers