Foresight: Iterative Reasoning About Clues that Matter for Navigation
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Open-world mapless navigation from sparse language instructions requires resolving underspecified goals and inferring which environmental cues are relevant for reaching the goal. For instance, reaching an out-of-view destination may require interpreting ramps, signs, or detours that reveal where to go or which route to take. Prior works are limited by their reliance on known navigation factors and closed-set factor categories, or identify cues before motion planning and miss plan-dependent cues. We argue that pretrained Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can discover novel instruction-relevant cues, but require adaptation to focus on which cues matter and how they should influence motion planning. We realize these ideas in Foresight, a test-time framework in which a finetuned VLM alternates between proposing image-space motion plans and critiquing them using the language goal and visual context. Subsequent plans are conditioned on prior critiques, enabling iterative motion refinement before execution. To align plan critiques and refinements with open-set behavior preferences, we learn a reward model from human feedback and use it to post-train the VLM with reinforcement learning in the plan-critique loop. In offline evaluations and 6 real-world environments, Foresight improves average task success by 37% and reduces interventions per mission by 52% relative to state-of-the-art test-time reasoning and foundation-model baselines, while running in real-time on a Jetson AGX Orin. We will release code, data, and training details to support future work on test-time reasoning for robot motion refinement. Additional videos at: https://amrl.cs.utexas.edu/foresight
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 31 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.
Builds on
31 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2026Self-Refining Vision Language Model for Robotic Failure Detection and Reasoning12 Feb
- 2025MolmoAct: Action Reasoning Models that can Reason in Space11 Aug
- 2025CoT-VLA: Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Vision-Language-Action Models27 Mar
- 2024Robotic Control via Embodied Chain-of-Thought Reasoning11 Jul
- 2022Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models12 Jul
Other references · 26
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 3,080
- 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,793
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,761
- 2024Depth Anything V2cited by 1,422
- 2023Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotationscited by 928
- 2025π*0.6: a VLA That Learns From Experiencecited by 303
- 2015Deep Spatial Autoencoders for Visuomotor Learningcited by 153
- 2025SimpleVLA-RL: Scaling VLA Training via Reinforcement Learningcited by 151
14 more
- 2025Alpamayo-R1: Bridging Reasoning and Action Prediction for Generalizable Autonomous Driving in the Long Tailcited by 146
- 2022Socially Compliant Navigation Dataset (SCAND): A Large-Scale Dataset of Demonstrations for Social Navigationcited by 127
- 2024GRAPE: Generalizing Robot Policy via Preference Alignmentcited by 109
- 2025VLA-RFT: Vision-Language-Action Reinforcement Fine-tuning with Verified Rewards in World Simulatorscited by 67
- 2024FLaRe: Achieving Masterful and Adaptive Robot Policies with Large-Scale Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuningcited by 54
- 2025OmniVLA: An Omni-Modal Vision-Language-Action Model for Robot Navigationcited by 38
- 20253D Aware Region Prompted Vision Language Modelcited by 33
- 2024LeLaN: Learning A Language-Conditioned Navigation Policy from In-the-Wild Videoscited by 32
- 2024InterPreT: Interactive Predicate Learning from Language Feedback for Generalizable Task Planningcited by 31
- 2025Human-assisted Robotic Policy Refinement via Action Preference Optimizationcited by 13
- 2025From Seeing to Experiencing: Scaling Navigation Foundation Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2025CREStE: Scalable Mapless Navigation with Internet Scale Priors and Counterfactual Guidancecited by 9
- 2026Generalizable Dense Reward for Long-Horizon Robotic Taskscited by 3
- 2025VENTURA: Adapting Image Diffusion Models for Unified Task Conditioned Navigationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026What do VLM-Based Vision-Language Navigation Models Rely on: Interpreting and Steering Policy Behavior
- 2025Visual Planning: Let's Think Only with Images
- 2025Expand Your SCOPE: Semantic Cognition over Potential-Based Exploration for Embodied Visual Navigation
- 2025NavForesee: A Unified Vision-Language World Model for Hierarchical Planning and Dual-Horizon Navigation Prediction
- 2025Progress-Think: Semantic Progress Reasoning for Vision-Language Navigation
- 2026Seek Before You Move: Evidence Seeking for Progress Grounding in Vision-Language Navigation
- 2025Using VLM Reasoning to Constrain Task and Motion Planning
- 2026GroundingVLN: Reasoning and Acting with Grounding for Vision-Language Navigation