SAIGuard: Communication-State Simulation for Proactive Defense of LLM Multi-Agent Systems
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) solve complex tasks through inter-agent collaboration, but their communication-driven nature also allows security risks to spread across agents and trigger system-wide failures. Existing MAS defenses mainly follow a reactive paradigm after execution by detecting and isolating harmful agents, which may cause irreversible damage and degrade collaborative utility. To address this, we propose a proactive defense framework for MAS security, namely a Simulation-aware Interception Guard (SAIGuard). SAIGuard performs communication-state simulation over the MAS interaction graph, estimates the impact of incoming messages on local agent states and the global MAS state, and detects risky messages via reconstruction deviations from benign communication patterns. Instead of isolating agents, SAIGuard sanitizes or regenerates suspicious messages before it propagation into system. Experiments across diverse topologies and attack scenarios show that SAIGuard reduces attack success rates while maintaining MAS utility, outperforming reactive defenses.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 16 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2026.
Builds on
16 of 29 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2025BlindGuard: Safeguarding LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems under Unknown Attacks11 Aug
- 2025AgentAuditor: Human-Level Safety and Security Evaluation for LLM Agents31 May
- 2025GUARDIAN: Safeguarding LLM Multi-Agent Collaborations with Temporal Graph Modeling25 May
- 2025WebInject: Prompt Injection Attack to Web Agents16 May
- 2025Red-Teaming LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Communication Attacks20 Feb
- 2024Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents19 Dec
- 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Bases17 Jul
Other references · 9
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2024A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agentscited by 622
- 2024Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A surveycited by 414
- 2025A Survey on Code Generation with LLM-based Agentscited by 104
- 2025Poison-RAG: Adversarial Data Poisoning Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Recommender Systemscited by 32
- 2025ReSo: A Reward-driven Self-organizing LLM-based Multi-Agent System for Reasoning Taskscited by 30
- 2025AnyMAC: Cascading Flexible Multi-Agent Collaboration via Next-Agent Predictioncited by 25
- 2025AMAS: Adaptively Determining Communication Topology for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systemcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026PropGuard: Safeguarding LLM-MAS via Propagation-Aware Exploration and Remediation
- 2026TrinityGuard: A Unified Framework for Safeguarding Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026GroupGuard: A Framework for Modeling and Defending Collusive Attacks in Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026ChannelGuard: Safe Models Do Not Compose into Safe Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026MESA: Prioritizing Vulnerable Communication Channels for Securing Multi-Agent Systems
- 2025A Survey of LLM-Driven AI Agent Communication: Protocols, Security Risks, and Defense Countermeasures
- 2025PeerGuard: Defending Multi-Agent Systems Against Backdoor Attacks Through Mutual Reasoning
- 2025Securing Multi-Agent Systems Against Corruptions via Node Contribution Backpropagation