mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MASK: Multi-Agent Semantic K-Scheduling for Risk-Sensitive 6G Robotics

arXiv 2606.11249 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026cs.RO cs.LG cs.MAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Realizing the vision of 6G connected robotics requires reconciling high-performance collaborative control with the rigid spectral limitations of physical wireless channels. In realistic collaborative sensing scenarios, spectral resources are quantized into finite physical resource blocks or orthogonal subcarriers, rendering simultaneous transmission by all agents infeasible. To address this, we propose Multi-Agent Semantic K-Scheduling (MASK), a control architecture designed to sustain robust, risk-aware coordination under strict instantaneous bandwidth caps. We introduce Arbiter-Assisted Semantic Information Gating (A-SIG), a lightweight coordination mechanism that enforces hard access constraints by scheduling only the top-K agents based on locally computed semantic importance scores. By aggregating these prioritized observations into a compact latent state, a self-supervised global encoder enables a distributional policy to mitigate tail risks despite data sparsity. We evaluate MASK across diverse benchmarks, demonstrating that it matches the performance of communication-unconstrained baselines even when channel access is restricted to a small fraction of the swarm size. Furthermore, the framework exhibits inherent resilience to packet erasures, validating semantic scheduling as a critical enabler for resource-constrained 6G systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

18 of 26 references.

References · 18

  1. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,031
  2. 2017A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learningcited by 743
  3. 2018QMIX: Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 697
  4. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
  5. 2017Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Quantile Regressioncited by 464
  6. 2018Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 362
  7. 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 355
  8. 2018TarMAC: Targeted Multi-Agent Communicationcited by 201
  9. 2018A Survey and Critique of Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 173
  10. 2018Learning Attentional Communication for Multi-Agent Cooperationcited by 170
  11. 2022Beyond Transmitting Bits: Context, Semantics, and Task-Oriented Communicationscited by 166
  12. 2017Deep Decentralized Multi-task Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning under Partial Observabilitycited by 143
6 more
  1. 2018Learning when to Communicate at Scale in Multiagent Cooperative and Competitive Taskscited by 114
  2. 2019Learning Nearly Decomposable Value Functions Via Communication Minimizationcited by 85
  3. 2021Risk-Averse Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
  4. 2021Semantic Communications in Networked Systems: A Data Significance Perspectivecited by 24
  5. 2023RiskQ: Risk-sensitive Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Value Factorizationcited by 19
  6. 2023Dynamic Routing for Integrated Satellite-Terrestrial Networks: A Constrained Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.