mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

STORM: Stepwise Token Optimization with Reward-Guided Beam Search

arXiv 2606.10621 ↗First posted 9 Jun 2026cs.IR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern retrieval increasingly relies on dense and learned-sparse neural models that are effective but require encoding the entire corpus into a specialized index, rebuilt whenever the model changes. Lexical retrievers like BM25 stay efficient and transparent on a standard inverted index that need not change as models evolve, but suffer from vocabulary mismatch. LLM query rewriting can help, yet prompted rewriters emit well-formed but retrieval-ineffective or harmful-terms, and training against a retrieval reward gives only delayed, sequence-level supervision that obscures which terms helped. We introduce STORM (Stepwise Token Optimization with Reward-guided beaM search), a self-supervised framework for lexical query expansion. STORM trains the rewriter through generation guided by retrieval metrics: at each step, candidate expansions are scored against the BM25 index and low-reward continuations pruned, turning the retrieval reward into a token-level signal that concentrates exploration on retrieval-effective vocabulary. Across TREC DL and BEIR, STORM lets 0.6B-8B backbones match or surpass competitive LLM rewriters while retrieving as fast as plain BM25; at 8B it rivals far larger proprietary rewriters. It further transfers zero-shot to 18 languages (MIRACL), beating dedicated multilingual dense retrievers on average, making STORM a competitive, infrastructure-light alternative to dense neural retrieval.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.

Builds on

24 of 39 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  3. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
  4. 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
  5. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,203
  6. 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
  7. 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 629
  8. 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 508
  9. 2016Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Modelscited by 299
  10. 2020Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning trackcited by 282
  11. 2021Overview of the TREC 2020 deep learning trackcited by 193
  12. 2024RQ-RAG: Learning to Refine Queries for Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 144
12 more
  1. 2021SPLADE v2: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for Information Retrievalcited by 126
  2. 2021Mr. TyDi: A Multi-lingual Benchmark for Dense Retrievalcited by 118
  3. 2021mMARCO: A Multilingual Version of the MS MARCO Passage Ranking Datasetcited by 116
  4. 2021Pyserini: An Easy-to-Use Python Toolkit to Support Replicable IR Research with Sparse and Dense Representationscited by 60
  5. 2024RaFe: Ranking Feedback Improves Query Rewriting for RAGcited by 47
  6. 2017Query expansion techniques for information retrieval: A surveycited by 44
  7. 2021MS MARCO: Benchmarking Ranking Models in the Large-Data Regimecited by 28
  8. 2023Generative Query Reformulation for Effective Adhoc Searchcited by 24
  9. 2025Can Generative LLMs Create Query Variants for Test Collections? An Exploratory Studycited by 10
  10. 2024Towards Competitive Search Relevance For Inference-Free Learned Sparse Retrieverscited by 8
  11. 2026A Reproducibility Study of LLM-Based Query Reformulationcited by 2
  12. 2025QueStER: Query Specification for Generative keyword-based Retrievalcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.