STORM: Stepwise Token Optimization with Reward-Guided Beam Search
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern retrieval increasingly relies on dense and learned-sparse neural models that are effective but require encoding the entire corpus into a specialized index, rebuilt whenever the model changes. Lexical retrievers like BM25 stay efficient and transparent on a standard inverted index that need not change as models evolve, but suffer from vocabulary mismatch. LLM query rewriting can help, yet prompted rewriters emit well-formed but retrieval-ineffective or harmful-terms, and training against a retrieval reward gives only delayed, sequence-level supervision that obscures which terms helped. We introduce STORM (Stepwise Token Optimization with Reward-guided beaM search), a self-supervised framework for lexical query expansion. STORM trains the rewriter through generation guided by retrieval metrics: at each step, candidate expansions are scored against the BM25 index and low-reward continuations pruned, turning the retrieval reward into a token-level signal that concentrates exploration on retrieval-effective vocabulary. Across TREC DL and BEIR, STORM lets 0.6B-8B backbones match or surpass competitive LLM rewriters while retrieving as fast as plain BM25; at 8B it rivals far larger proprietary rewriters. It further transfers zero-shot to 18 languages (MIRACL), beating dedicated multilingual dense retrievers on average, making STORM a competitive, infrastructure-light alternative to dense neural retrieval.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2026.
Builds on
24 of 39 references.
References · 24
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
- 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,225
- 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,203
- 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,160
- 2019Passage Re-ranking with BERTcited by 629
- 2022Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labelscited by 508
- 2016Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Modelscited by 299
- 2020Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning trackcited by 282
- 2021Overview of the TREC 2020 deep learning trackcited by 193
- 2024RQ-RAG: Learning to Refine Queries for Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 144
12 more
- 2021SPLADE v2: Sparse Lexical and Expansion Model for Information Retrievalcited by 126
- 2021Mr. TyDi: A Multi-lingual Benchmark for Dense Retrievalcited by 118
- 2021mMARCO: A Multilingual Version of the MS MARCO Passage Ranking Datasetcited by 116
- 2021Pyserini: An Easy-to-Use Python Toolkit to Support Replicable IR Research with Sparse and Dense Representationscited by 60
- 2024RaFe: Ranking Feedback Improves Query Rewriting for RAGcited by 47
- 2017Query expansion techniques for information retrieval: A surveycited by 44
- 2021MS MARCO: Benchmarking Ranking Models in the Large-Data Regimecited by 28
- 2023Generative Query Reformulation for Effective Adhoc Searchcited by 24
- 2025Can Generative LLMs Create Query Variants for Test Collections? An Exploratory Studycited by 10
- 2024Towards Competitive Search Relevance For Inference-Free Learned Sparse Retrieverscited by 8
- 2026A Reproducibility Study of LLM-Based Query Reformulationcited by 2
- 2025QueStER: Query Specification for Generative keyword-based Retrievalcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.