Fisher-Guided Progressive Parameter Selection for Adaptive Fine-Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning often selects trainable parameters before adaptation using architectural heuristics, without accounting for their varying importance during training. We introduce FisherAdapTune, which progressively selects parameter groups based on temporal drift in their Fisher information. Under a local Gaussian approximation, we bound the divergence between the fine-tuned posterior and pretrained prior by accumulated Fisher-weighted update costs, motivating curvature-aware selection. FisherAdapTune measures Jensen-Shannon distance between successive Fisher-value distributions and uses an adaptive threshold to freeze stabilized groups. Across VTAB-1k classification tasks, it achieves the highest macro Top-1 accuracy among the compared methods with a smaller average trainable set than full fine-tuning. Across four segmentation backbones, it maintains competitive in-distribution performance and improves zero-shot transfer in several settings. Its selections reveal architecture-dependent patterns where input, output, and normalization parameters can remain trainable as attention and MLP groups freeze at different rates. The results support Fisher structural drift as a task-dependent signal for allocating updates during adaptation. We release our hrefhttps://github.com/AtlasAnalyticsLab/FisherAdapTunecode publicly to enable further application of our proposed approach.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.
Builds on
40 of 56 references.
References · 40
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,940
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
- 2022AdaptFormer: Adapting Vision Transformers for Scalable Visual Recognitioncited by 719
- 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
- 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 656
28 more
- 2022Vision Transformer Adapter for Dense Predictionscited by 565
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 533
- 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
- 2023AdaLoRA: Adaptive Budget Allocation for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 357
- 2020Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning with Diff Pruningcited by 352
- 2022How Do Vision Transformers Work?cited by 307
- 2022Exploring Visual Prompts for Adapting Large-Scale Modelscited by 274
- 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
- 2021Raise a Child in Large Language Model: Towards Effective and Generalizable Fine-tuningcited by 146
- 2021Composable Sparse Fine-Tuning for Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 144
- 2018Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: A PAC-Bayesian Compression Approachcited by 126
- 2022Convolutional Bypasses Are Better Vision Transformer Adapterscited by 121
- 2020Masking as an Efficient Alternative to Finetuning for Pretrained Language Modelscited by 93
- 2022Parameter-efficient Model Adaptation for Vision Transformerscited by 81
- 2024LoRA-Pro: Are Low-Rank Adapters Properly Optimized?cited by 77
- 2022PAC-Bayes Compression Bounds So Tight That They Can Explain Generalizationcited by 76
- 2022Make Sharpness-Aware Minimization Stronger: A Sparsified Perturbation Approachcited by 70
- 2023Tuning LayerNorm in Attention: Towards Efficient Multi-Modal LLM Finetuningcited by 64
- 2023Diversity-Aware Meta Visual Promptingcited by 58
- 2021AutoFreeze: Automatically Freezing Model Blocks to Accelerate Fine-tuningcited by 48
- 2025Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Foundation Modelscited by 45
- 2024Selecting Large Language Model to Fine-tune via Rectified Scaling Lawcited by 33
- 2025FisherTune: Fisher-Guided Robust Tuning of Vision Foundation Models for Domain Generalized Segmentationcited by 16
- 2023Fine-tuning vision foundation model for crack segmentation in civil infrastructurescited by 14
- 2024AdaFisher: Adaptive Second Order Optimization via Fisher Informationcited by 14
- 2023Real-time High-Resolution Neural Network with Semantic Guidance for Crack Segmentationcited by 10
- 2024Trade-Offs of Diagonal Fisher Information Matrix Estimatorscited by 10
- 2025Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvature (KFAC) From Scratchcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.