mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Using Probabilistic Programs to Train Inductive Reasoning in Large Language Models

arXiv 2606.09856 ↗First posted 26 May 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Test-time compute and efficient thinking

Abstract (arXiv)

Post-training Large Language Models (LLMs) for reasoning typically focuses on deductive tasks such as mathematics and coding where correctness is verifiable. Yet, many real-world reasoning problems are inductive: agents must infer uncertain beliefs from sparse, ambiguous observations. There are challenges to using standard fine-tuning methods for inductive reasoning, including difficulties in curating large-scale, high-quality labeled datasets and in handling targets that are inherently distributional. In this work, we introduce a novel approach, called Program-based Posterior Training (PPT), to address these limitations: we use an LLM to generate diverse open-world scenarios as probabilistic programs, run probabilistic inference to produce distributional target responses to queries, and then fine-tune on these probabilistic soft labels. Using this approach, we fine-tune LLMs on 10,000 programmatically generated scenarios and evaluate on held-out motifs, human-labeled judgments, and external benchmarks. Overall, PPT substantially improves estimation accuracy on held-out inductive tasks, increases alignment with human judgments, and transfers to external benchmarks for estimation and calibration. Additionally, the gains in raw calibration are not subsumed by post-hoc temperature scaling, showing that the models have more deeply internalized uncertainty compared to output rescaling. Together, these results suggest that probabilistic-program-mediated fine-tuning is a promising approach for post-training LLMs to reliably perform approximate inductive inference.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 5 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 May 2026.

Builds on

5 of 39 references.

References · 5

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  2. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  3. 2023Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solvecited by 175
  4. 2025A Study of LLMs' Preferences for Libraries and Programming Languagescited by 20
  5. 2025Meta-learning ecological priors from large language models explains human learning and decision makingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Diagnosing and Improving Probabilistic Reasoning in Large Language Models
  2. 2022ThinkSum: Probabilistic reasoning over sets using large language models
  3. 2025Reasoning Under Uncertainty: Exploring Probabilistic Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs
  4. 2025A Survey of Inductive Reasoning for Large Language Models
  5. 2024On the Role of Model Prior in Real-World Inductive Reasoning
  6. 2023Teaching Probabilistic Logical Reasoning to Transformers
  7. 2024Reasoning over Uncertain Text by Generative Large Language Models
  8. 2023Hypothesis Search: Inductive Reasoning with Language Models