mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

UXBench: Benchmarking User Experience in AI Assistants

arXiv 2606.09570 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026cs.CL cs.HCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As AI assistants serve millions of users daily, evaluating user experience (UX) beyond general model capability has become increasingly important. We present UXBench, the first user-centric benchmark grounded in real user feedback signals for evaluating preference alignment and dialogue generation. The benchmark consists of three interconnected tasks, UX Judge, UX Eval, and UX Recovery, with 7,400 test instances extracted from over 70K interaction logs of a mainstream Chinese AI assistant. The dataset closely reflects real user distributions, covering 8 scenarios, 83 domains, and diverse failure patterns that pose severe challenges. Extensive experiments on 26 frontier language models provide novel insights into how well models perceive user experience and how improvements in model capability contribute to better dialogue engagement. Through analyses of model behavior and performance gaps, we document six important findings, demonstrating that user feedback prediction is a learnable capability and revealing different aspects that influence user experience. UXBench establishes a new evaluation landscape and calls for greater attention to tailored UX optimization, contributing toward a user-centric scaling law for the development of successful AI assistants. The full project is released at https://github.com/mengze-hong/UXBench.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

0 of 45 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026PerceptUI: LLM Agents as Human-Aligned Synthetic Users for UI/UX Evaluation
  2. 2026UserProxyBench: Evaluating LLM User Simulators for Agent Benchmarks and Training
  3. 2025UserBench: An Interactive Gym Environment for User-Centric Agents
  4. 2026Reasoning for Mobile User Experience with Multimodal LLMs: Task, Benchmark, and Approach
  5. 2023UltraFeedback: Boosting Language Models with Scaled AI Feedback
  6. 2026Training Computer Use Agents to Assess the Usability of Graphical User Interfaces
  7. 2026Automatic multimodal UX improvement recommendations from LLM agent user simulations
  8. 2025When Users Are Happy but Agents Are Wrong: Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Tool-Augmented Dialogue