mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PRISM: Recovering Instruction Sets from Language Model Activations

arXiv 2606.09563 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As LLMs are deployed as agents, reliable monitoring requires knowing not only what they output, but which instructions are steering their behavior. This is difficult when models infer unintended subgoals, follow contextual cues, or are influenced by prompt injections and hidden objectives. While activation-to-language methods suggest that hidden states can reveal natural-language information, existing approaches are not designed to recover the full set of simultaneous instructions, constraints, prohibitions, and subgoals present in agentic settings. As a first step toward this monitoring goal, we formalize instruction set retrieval and introduce PRISM, an activation-conditioned interpreter that decodes hidden states from a frozen target model into a faithful bullet list of instructions. Unlike prior activation-to-language methods, PRISM is trained to recover instruction sets directly, using judge-guided GRPO to reward covered instructions and penalize unsupported ones. Across benign, constrained, prompt-injection, and hidden-objective settings, PRISM outperforms activation-to-language baselines, especially on security-relevant objectives.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

18 of 34 references.

References · 18

  1. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
  3. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  4. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  5. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  6. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  7. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 760
  8. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
  9. 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 608
  10. 2023Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Modelscited by 237
  11. 2024Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language Modelscited by 225
  12. 2024LatentQA: Teaching LLMs to Decode Activations Into Natural Languagecited by 49
6 more
  1. 2025Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainerscited by 41
  2. 2024Obfuscated Activations Bypass LLM Latent-Space Defensescited by 40
  3. 2025RL-Obfuscation: Can Language Models Learn to Evade Latent-Space Monitors?cited by 19
  4. 2025False Sense of Security: Why Probing-based Malicious Input Detection Fails to Generalizecited by 15
  5. 2025LLM Jailbreak Detection for (Almost) Free!cited by 13
  6. 2025Predictive Concept Decoders: Training Scalable End-to-End Interpretability Assistantscited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Compiled Memory: Not More Information, but More Precise Instructions for Language Agents
  2. 2024Do LLMs "know" internally when they follow instructions?
  3. 2026ACCORD: Action-Conditioned Contextual Grounding for Language Agents
  4. 2025Can Language Models Follow Multiple Turns of Entangled Instructions?
  5. 2026SkillApt: Learning When to Activate Agent Skills from Counterfactual Evidence
  6. 2025Do What? Teaching Vision-Language-Action Models to Reject the Impossible
  7. 2026Many-Tier Instruction Hierarchy in LLM Agents
  8. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions