Securing Self-supervised Data Curation for Foundation Models Robustness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-supervised data curation provides a pathway to scaling and improving the generalization capabilities of machine learning models. By leveraging self-supervised learning (SSL) for data curation, the demand for massive training datasets required by foundation models can be effectively met. SSL greatly alleviates the costs associated with annotation and manual dataset curation while minimizing the need for human oversight. However, the integrity of SSL-curated datasets must be rigorously checked, as reliance on anonymous and unvetted external sources can substantially increase the risk of data poisoning. In this paper, we propose a Poisoned Data Detector (PDD), an active defense mechanism designed to ensure the integrity of SSL-curated datasets prior to foundation model training. PDDs are designed using a combination of the pretrained ImageBind model and traditional classifiers, including Random Forest (RF), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB), and Support Vector Machines (SVM). We rigorously evaluated PDDs using 176,200 images from three diverse datasets and three different adversarial attacks encompassing both in-distribution and out-of-distribution scenarios. Notably, SVM-PDD achieves superior performance for both in-distribution (Set3-Set5) and out-of-distribution (TrueFace and 140K RealFace) datasets. Our design demonstrates strong scalability and enables the rapid integration of new adversarial attack detectors through an ensemble approach.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.
Builds on
25 of 41 references.
References · 25
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2023ImageBind: One Embedding Space To Bind Them Allcited by 1,162
- 2020Self-supervised Learning: Generative or Contrastivecited by 693
- 2018Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 550
- 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 544
- 2020A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospectscited by 396
- 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 381
13 more
- 2024The Faiss librarycited by 370
- 2023A Survey on Self-supervised Learning: Algorithms, Applications, and Future Trendscited by 205
- 2021Hyperparameter Optimization: Foundations, Algorithms, Best Practices and Open Challengescited by 143
- 2021SPECTRE: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks Using Robust Statisticscited by 123
- 2021Few-shot Backdoor Defense Using Shapley Estimationcited by 40
- 2023Backdoor Defense via Deconfounded Representation Learningcited by 38
- 2021De-Pois: An Attack-Agnostic Defense against Data Poisoning Attackscited by 29
- 2024Few-shot Adaptation of Multi-modal Foundation Models: A Surveycited by 28
- 2023Defending Against Patch-based Backdoor Attacks on Self-Supervised Learningcited by 19
- 2024Semantic Shield: Defending Vision-Language Models Against Backdooring and Poisoning via Fine-grained Knowledge Alignmentcited by 7
- 2024YaART: Yet Another ART Rendering Technologycited by 5
- 2020Detection of Iterative Adversarial Attacks via Counter Attackcited by 4
- 2025An Investigation of Visual Foundation Models Robustnesscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.