Intention Driven Identification of In-Possession Match Phases in Association Football through Temporal Graph Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding tactical organisation in association football requires identifying in-possession match phases that are shaped by evolving tactical intentions rather than by spatial patterns alone. This study proposes an intention-driven framework for identifying phases from tracking data. Seven German Bundesliga matches recorded at 25 Hz with TRACAB were analysed. A hierarchical model was defined with three tactical intentions (Invade Opponent Space, Keep Possession, Scoring) and six phases (Build Up, Progression, Counter Attack, Maintenance, Sustained Threat, Finishing). A Temporal Graph Attention Network (T-GAN) combined frame-level player-interaction graphs, contextual features, and Transformer-based temporal modelling. Performance was evaluated using frame-level F1 and temporal Intersection over Union (tIoU). T-GAN achieved macro-average frame-level F1 scores of 0.87 at the intention level, 0.76 for invasion-related phases, and 0.79 for scoring phases. After filtering, mean class-wise tIoU increased from 0.44 to 0.67 for intentions and from 0.40 to 0.57 for phases, showing that sequence-level evaluation captured fragmentation and boundary errors missed by frame-level metrics. Model comparisons indicated that Transformer-based sequence modelling drove coherent segmentation, while graph-based relational modelling was most beneficial for Counter Attack. Misalignment analysis revealed common sequence level misalignments, mainly Build Up/Progression ambiguity, Build Up/Maintenance confusion, Counter Attack/Progression inconsistency, and shortened pre-shot Finishing segments. Overall, the framework translates tracking data into tactically interpretable phase representations for automated annotation, tactical analysis, and playing-style profiling.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.
Builds on
7 of 59 references.
References · 7
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2019Human Motion Trajectory Prediction: A Surveycited by 231
- 2019SR-LSTM: State Refinement for LSTM towards Pedestrian Trajectory Predictioncited by 111
- 2015Crowded Scene Analysis: A Surveycited by 21
- 2018The ActivityNet Large-Scale Activity Recognition Challenge 2018 Summarycited by 15
- 2025OpenSTARLab: Open Approach for Spatio-Temporal Agent Data Analysis in Soccercited by 7
- 2018Precise Temporal Action Localization by Evolving Temporal Proposalscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.