mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

PAI: Preserving Amplitude Information in Representation-Based Time-Series Anomaly Detection

arXiv 2606.08935 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Representation-based time-series anomaly detection algorithms significantly outperform other methods on diverse anomaly detection tasks. However, we notice that they suffer from a major limitation in our evaluation - their learned embeddings are often amplitude-agnostic. Losing amplitude information can degrade performance on amplitude related anomalies, and this failure is prevalent across all existing representation-based methods. To address aforementioned issues, we propose a new anomaly scoring scheme named PAI. PAI consists of two complementary modules, a diagnostic module and a final score augmentation function. The diagnostic module compares cosine and Euclidean scoring on the same representation bank to test whether amplitude information is already captured in the learned representation. Then in final score augmentation function, PAI computes a point-wise median and MAD deviation score and a local mean-shift score-which are fused with the representation score to produce the final anomaly score. On the TSB-AD-U-Eva and TAB UV datasets, PAI improves all four evaluated representation-based methods across every reported metric, achieving average VUS-PR gains of 98.4% and 36.8%, respectively. Among all evaluated combinations, PaAno + PAI achieves the best performance, outperforming the state-of-the-art method by 15%. Further evaluation on bootstrap confidence intervals, anomaly-type breakdowns, and a TS2Vec input-normalization ablation further support the proposed scheme. These results suggest that explicitly retaining amplitude information is important for representation-based time-series anomaly detection, which has been underemphasized in existing scoring schemes. Code is available at: https://github.com/pantheon5100/PAI

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

17 of 26 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,009
  2. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,492
  3. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,915
  4. 2022Are Transformers Effective for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 1,413
  5. 2022TimesNet: Temporal 2D-Variation Modeling for General Time Series Analysiscited by 1,043
  6. 2023A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecastingcited by 674
  7. 2021TS2Vec: Towards Universal Representation of Time Seriescited by 469
  8. 2024MOMENT: A Family of Open Time-series Foundation Modelscited by 468
  9. 2021Anomaly Transformer: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Association Discrepancycited by 390
  10. 2022TranAD: Deep Transformer Networks for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 211
  11. 2023FITS: Modeling Time Series with 10k Parameterscited by 190
  12. 2023DCdetector: Dual Attention Contrastive Representation Learning for Time Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 103
5 more
  1. 2022Dual Temperature Helps Contrastive Learning Without Many Negative Samples: Towards Understanding and Simplifying MoCocited by 52
  2. 2024Towards a General Time Series Anomaly Detector with Adaptive Bottlenecks and Dual Adversarial Decoderscited by 38
  3. 2024KAN-AD: Time Series Anomaly Detection with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 23
  4. 2025TSPulse: Tiny Pre-Trained Models with Disentangled Representations for Rapid Time-Series Analysiscited by 12
  5. 2026PaAno: Patch-Based Representation Learning for Time-Series Anomaly Detectioncited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.