CHROMA: Detecting AI-Generated Images through Inter-Channel Color-Space Correlations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid adoption of diffusion and large-scale generative models has made it increasingly challenging to distinguish synthetic imagery from real photographs. While automated detectors have been proposed, their generalization to unseen generators remains brittle. To address this limitation, we investigate inter-channel color correlations, a lightweight and underexploited forensic cue. We first demonstrate that LPIPS, a widely used perceptual metric, exhibits inconsistent responses to perturbations that selectively alter channel dependence across different color-space parameterizations, indicating that cross-channel statistics are not uniformly constrained by common perceptual training objectives. Motivated by this, we analyze the distributions of pairwise inter-channel correlation features across multiple color spaces. Our analysis reveals systematic, generator-specific differences in these distributions, with RGB and Lab color spaces providing the most apparent separation between real and generated images. Building on this, we introduce Chroma, a detector of AI-generated images which augments standard RGB inputs with inter-channel correlation maps and employs a fixed CNN backbone trained with a modest computational budget. We assess its robustness under both single-generator training and a limited multi-generator supervision regime, where only a few samples from additional generators are available. Across a standard benchmark protocol, correlation-augmented inputs improve real-vs-generated discrimination and robustness, yielding performance competitive with recent detectors while maintaining a simple architecture and training procedure. Code is available at https://github.com/JPSoteloSilva/CHROMA
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2026.
Builds on
18 of 33 references.
References · 18
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 490
- 2023DIRE for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 390
- 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 273
- 2023Raising the Bar of AI-generated Image Detection with CLIPcited by 164
- 2021Are GAN generated images easy to detect? A critical analysis of the state-of-the-artcited by 139
- 2023Intriguing properties of synthetic images: from generative adversarial networks to diffusion modelscited by 123
- 2024SIDA: Social Media Image Deepfake Detection, Localization and Explanation with Large Multimodal Modelcited by 108
- 2023CIFAKE: Image Classification and Explainable Identification of AI-Generated Synthetic Imagescited by 84
6 more
- 2024Any-Resolution AI-Generated Image Detection by Spectral Learningcited by 57
- 2023Online Detection of AI-Generated Imagescited by 55
- 2024Community Forensics: Using Thousands of Generators to Train Fake Image Detectorscited by 50
- 2024FIRE: Robust Detection of Diffusion-Generated Images via Frequency-Guided Reconstruction Errorcited by 47
- 2022Detecting GAN-generated Images by Orthogonal Training of Multiple CNNscited by 46
- 2023Detecting Images Generated by Deep Diffusion Models using their Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 44
Built on by
Not cited yet.