mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PIPE-Cypher: Automatic Enterprise Benchmark Generation for Text-to-Cypher Systems

arXiv 2606.08481 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.DBcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Enterprise property graphs vary widely in schema structure, internal terminology, domain assumptions, governance constraints, and user interaction patterns. A deployment-relevant Text2Cypher benchmark therefore reflects the questions users and agents actually ask of that graph. Creating such a benchmark is difficult because schemas and values are unique, and graph structure changes over time. Each NL-query pair must also be executable, use real graph entities, preserve diversity, and remain balanced across query types and difficulty levels. We present PIPE-Cypher, a local benchmark-generation pipeline that turns a live property graph and optional seed queries from customer questions, analyst logs, or agent tool calls into balanced NL-to-Cypher benchmarks. PIPE-Cypher combines schema profiling, reverse-query grounding, constrained generation, deterministic Cypher governance, execution validation, redaction, diversity controls, and a calibrated local LLM judge. Using local Qwen3.5-9B generation and judging, PIPE-Cypher exports 3,000 accepted FinBench/SNB examples, completes three audited ablation suites, calibrates judge behavior with human labels, and evaluates 11 local downstream models. The resulting benchmark is deliberately discriminative: zero-shot transfer is weak, while a few-shot control shows that schema-specific example banks can help compatible model families. Together, PIPE-Cypher makes Text2Cypher benchmarking a repeatable process that evolves with the graph, its users, and its target workloads.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2026.

Builds on

15 of 35 references.

References · 15

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  3. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  4. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
  5. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 688
  6. 2018Texygen: A Benchmarking Platform for Text Generation Modelscited by 491
  7. 2024Spider 2.0: Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Enterprise Text-to-SQL Workflowscited by 232
  8. 2018Robust Text-to-SQL Generation with Execution-Guided Decodingcited by 52
  9. 2024Text2Cypher: Bridging Natural Language and Graph Databasescited by 30
  10. 2021FrugalScore: Learning Cheaper, Lighter and Faster Evaluation Metricsfor Automatic Text Generationcited by 19
  11. 2024SyntheT2C: Generating Synthetic Data for Fine-Tuning Large Language Models on the Text2Cypher Taskcited by 19
  12. 2024CypherBench: Towards Precise Retrieval over Full-scale Modern Knowledge Graphs in the LLM Eracited by 16
3 more
  1. 2024Auto-Cypher: Improving LLMs on Cypher generation via LLM-supervised generation-verification frameworkcited by 10
  2. 2023The LDBC Social Network Benchmark Interactive workload v2: A transactional graph query benchmark with deep delete operationscited by 1
  3. 2026PIPE-RDF: An LLM-Assisted Pipeline for Enterprise RDF Benchmarkingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.