Cross Paraphrastic Invariance Learning for Hallucination Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate hallucinations, which are unsupported by a source document. To avoid costly LLM-as-evaluator pipelines and the heavy annotation demands of existing classifiers, we propose CPIL (Cross Paraphrastic Invariance Learning), a two-stage Siamese framework that maximizes the utility of existing labeled data. Concretely, CPIL constructs informative training pairs by: (i) generating paraphrastic views of each document-claim example as positives, and explicitly aligning their representations to enforce invariance to surface form; and (ii) mining same-document, opposite-label pairs as hard negatives to sharpen document-sensitive decision boundaries. Then CPIL conduct a two-stage model training: Stage 1 performs contrastive pretraining to learn a paraphrase-invariant, grounding-aware embedding space; and Stage 2 attaches a lightweight classifier for binary groundedness. On the LLM-AggreFact benchmark (11 tasks), CPIL surpasses strong baselines concerning F1 scores with only ~1% labeled data, showing its prediction superiority and label efficiency.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2026.
Builds on
24 of 25 references.
References · 24
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 900
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 810
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 807
- 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 584
- 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 407
- 2023AlignScore: Evaluating Factual Consistency with a Unified Alignment Functioncited by 288
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 276
12 more
- 2024MiniCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of LLMs on Grounding Documentscited by 257
- 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 236
- 2019Neural Machine Translation: A Review and Surveycited by 100
- 2024Unified Hallucination Detection for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 75
- 2018A Twofold Siamese Network for Real-Time Object Trackingcited by 62
- 2024GraphEval: A Knowledge-Graph Based LLM Hallucination Evaluation Frameworkcited by 30
- 2021Data Augmentation in Natural Language Processing: A Novel Text Generation Approach for Long and Short Text Classifierscited by 24
- 2025Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models with Metamorphic Relationscited by 24
- 2025Importing Phantoms: Measuring LLM Package Hallucination Vulnerabilitiescited by 15
- 2025FactCG: Enhancing Fact Checkers with Graph-Based Multi-Hop Datacited by 14
- 2025Hallucination to Truth: A Review of Fact-Checking and Factuality Evaluation in Large Language Modelscited by 13
- 2021Self-learn to Explain Siamese Networks Robustlycited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.