mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Assessing model calibration with boosting trees

arXiv 2606.08084 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2026math.ST stat.AP stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The main goal in regression modelling consists in approximating the conditional mean of a response given a set of features. A regression function is said to be calibrated if the resulting mean estimates match the true conditional means for almost every set of features. Aiming for calibration seems not achievable in practice as one typically deals with finite samples of noisy observations. A weaker notion of calibration is auto-calibration, and it means that the expectation of responses being given the same mean estimate matches this estimate. This notion is important, e.g., in insurance pricing as it ensures no cross-subsidization between different price cohorts. In this paper, we show that boosting trees can be used to test necessary conditions for calibration and auto-calibration, respectively. The practical relevance of our approach is supported by a numerical example, in which the proposed tests prove to be very powerful on a large insurance dataset.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2026.

Builds on

8 of 33 references.

References · 8

  1. 2021Regression Diagnostics meets Forecast Evaluation: Conditional Calibration, Reliability Diagrams, and Coefficient of Determinationcited by 31
  2. 2021Autocalibration and Tweedie-dominance for Insurance Pricing with Machine Learningcited by 18
  3. 2018Generic Conditions for Forecast Dominancecited by 13
  4. 2022Model Comparison and Calibration Assessment: User Guide for Consistent Scoring Functions in Machine Learning and Actuarial Practicecited by 11
  5. 2020The Murphy Decomposition and the Calibration-Resolution Principle: A New Perspective on Forecast Evaluationcited by 7
  6. 2023Isotonic Recalibration under a Low Signal-to-Noise Ratiocited by 7
  7. 2022A safe Hosmer-Lemeshow testcited by 1
  8. 2025Calibration Bands for Mean Estimates within the Exponential Dispersion Familycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.