The Murphy Decomposition and the Calibration-Resolution Principle: A New Perspective on Forecast Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
I provide a unifying perspective on forecast evaluation, characterizing accurate forecasts of all types, from simple point to complete probabilistic forecasts, in terms of two fundamental underlying properties, autocalibration and resolution, which can be interpreted as describing a lack of systematic mistakes and a high information content. This "calibration-resolution principle" gives a new insight into the nature of forecasting and generalizes the famous sharpness principle by Gneiting et al. (2007) from probabilistic to all types of forecasts. It amongst others exposes the shortcomings of several widely used forecast evaluation methods. The principle is based on a fully general version of the Murphy decomposition of loss functions, which I provide. Special cases of this decomposition are well-known and widely used in meteorology. Besides using the decomposition in this new theoretical way, after having introduced it and the underlying properties in a proper theoretical framework, accompanied by an illustrative example, I also employ it in its classical sense as a forecast evaluation method as the meteorologists do: As such, it unveils the driving forces behind forecast errors and complements classical forecast evaluation methods. I discuss estimation of the decomposition via kernel regression and then apply it to popular economic forecasts. Analysis of mean forecasts from the US Survey of Professional Forecasters and quantile forecasts derived from Bank of England fan charts indeed yield interesting new insights and highlight the potential of the method.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 May 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Meta-Learning Priors for Safe Bayesian Optimizationcited by 14
- 2025Rethinking Early Stopping: Refine, Then Calibratecited by 13
- 2022Model Comparison and Calibration Assessment: User Guide for Consistent Scoring Functions in Machine Learning and Actuarial Practicecited by 11
- 2024Reassessing How to Compare and Improve the Calibration of Machine Learning Modelscited by 7
- 2023Fairness in Ranking under Disparate Uncertaintycited by 4
- 2025Calibration Bands for Mean Estimates within the Exponential Dispersion Familycited by 1
- 2026Assessing model calibration with boosting treescited by 0
- 2026Assessing model calibration with boosting trees6 Jun 2026
- 2025Calibration Bands for Mean Estimates within the Exponential Dispersion Family24 Mar 2025
- 2025Rethinking Early Stopping: Refine, Then Calibrate31 Jan 2025
- 2024Reassessing How to Compare and Improve the Calibration of Machine Learning Models6 Jun 2024
- 2023Fairness in Ranking under Disparate Uncertainty4 Sep 2023
- 2022Meta-Learning Priors for Safe Bayesian Optimization3 Oct 2022
- 2022Model Comparison and Calibration Assessment: User Guide for Consistent Scoring Functions in Machine Learning and Actuarial Practice25 Feb 2022