Defending LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems Against Cooperative Attacks with Sentence-Level Rectification
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent years have witnessed the rapid development of Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS), which excel at collaborative decision-making and complex problem-solving. However, malicious agents in MAS may inject misinformation to mislead other agents and disrupt system performance, giving rise to a new research direction that focuses on attack mechanisms and defense strategies in MAS. Prior studies largely assume malicious agents act independently and investigate the corresponding defense strategies. However, we argue that malicious agents may exhibit collaborative behaviors, enabling more effective attacks through internal information exchange. In this paper, we propose an adaptive cooperative attack framework, where malicious agents autonomously coordinate and dynamically adjust their attack strategies through multi-round interactions. Furthermore, we introduce Sentence-Level Trustworthiness Analysis and Rectification (STAR), a defense framework that identifies and rectifies misleading information at the sentence level within agent communications. Our experiments show that cooperative attacks lead to a significantly larger degradation in task success rate than independent attacks, resulting in a relative drop of 5.34%. Meanwhile, STAR effectively mitigates both cooperative and independent threats and improves task success rate by an average of 36.76%. The code is available at https://github.com/smoooom/STAR.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 23 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2026.
Builds on
23 of 37 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2026GroupGuard: A Framework for Modeling and Defending Collusive Attacks in Multi-Agent Systems14 Mar
- 2025BlindGuard: Safeguarding LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems under Unknown Attacks11 Aug
- 2025Red-Teaming LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Communication Attacks20 Feb
- 2024AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge Bases17 Jul
- 2024Flooding Spread of Manipulated Knowledge in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Communities10 Jul
- 2024Agent Smith: A Single Image Can Jailbreak One Million Multimodal LLM Agents Exponentially Fast13 Feb
- 2023Evil Geniuses: Delving into the Safety of LLM-based Agents20 Nov
Other references · 16
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,876
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,218
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,823
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,805
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,433
- 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 1,001
- 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 817
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 800
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 740
- 2023A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaborationcited by 284
- 2023Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attackscited by 277
- 2023Poisoning Retrieval Corpora by Injecting Adversarial Passagescited by 157
4 more
- 2024Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations for LLM Conversation Safety: A Surveycited by 130
- 2024On the Resilience of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration with Faulty Agentscited by 94
- 2024MultiAgent Collaboration Attack: Investigating Adversarial Attacks in Large Language Model Collaborations via Debatecited by 56
- 2025How to Protect Yourself from 5G Radiation? Investigating LLM Responses to Implicit Misinformationcited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026When Embedding-Based Defenses Fail: Rethinking Safety in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems
- 2025Demonstrations of Integrity Attacks in Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Don't Trust Stubborn Neighbors: A Security Framework for Agentic Networks
- 2026CoopGuard: Stateful Cooperative Agents Safeguarding LLMs Against Evolving Multi-Round Attacks
- 2025The Dark Side of LLMs: Agent-based Attack Vectors for System-level Compromise
- 2025Securing Multi-Agent Systems Against Corruptions via Node Contribution Backpropagation
- 2025Attack the Messages, Not the Agents: A Multi-round Adaptive Stealthy Tampering Framework for LLM-MAS
- 2026Insider Attacks in Multi-Agent LLM Consensus Systems