Unlocking Latent Value: Taxonomy-Guided Recovery of High-Performing Data from Low-Tier Web Corpora
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dominant web data curation pipelines for pretraining collapse document quality into a single composite score, systematically missing high-value content along dimensions the scorer underweights. We present a taxonomy-driven framework that recovers this value by filtering along semantically meaningful dimensions that composite scores fail to capture. First, building on the ESSENTIAL-WEB taxonomy, we introduce two novel dimensions: timeliness and cultural specificity, both of which show low pairwise NMI with existing ones. We annotate 14M documents using Qwen2.5 32B and distill into a lightweight 0.5B model. To enable rapid corpus-wide annotation, we additionally train a 73M multi-task MLP on E5 embeddings, achieving 50x inference throughput. Second, to navigate the combinatorial explosion of filter configurations, we introduce a compute-efficient two-pass framework: Pass 1 identifies the strongest dimension signals at small scale; Pass 2 constructs and evaluates conjunctive and disjunctive compound filters from the top performers - identifying high-performing configurations at a fraction of full scaling-law cost. Applying the selected filters to deprioritized web data, taxonomy-filtered subsets outperform their unfiltered baselines and even surpass the highest-quality tier. On mid-tier data, our best filter improves over its unfiltered baseline by 12.1% on reasoning, 9.5% on coding, and 2.0% on knowledge benchmarks, exceeding unfiltered top-tier data by 6.7% on reasoning and 13.7% on coding. Furthermore, filtered data from two tiers below the typical production threshold improves by 22.3% on reasoning and 19.5% on coding over its unfiltered baseline, surpassing top-tier data on coding benchmarks. These results establish that vast latent value remains locked in deprioritized web data, and that multi-dimensional taxonomy filtering is a principled, compute-efficient key to unlocking it.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.
Builds on
11 of 15 references.
References · 11
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
- 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 398
- 2024Multilingual E5 Text Embeddings: A Technical Reportcited by 372
- 2021Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Modelscited by 230
- 2024AboutMe: Using Self-Descriptions in Webpages to Document the Effects of English Pretraining Data Filterscited by 22
Built on by
Not cited yet.