GRASP: Geometry-aware Residual Alignment for Scalable Pretraining Data Attribution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Scalable data attribution methods typically assign isolated utility scores to individual training examples. This prevalent additive assumption fundamentally fails to capture critical subset dynamics, including data redundancy and complementary coverage. In this work, we reframe attribution as subset-level counterfactual utility prediction and introduce GRASP, an interaction-aware surrogate. Grounded in a theoretical smoothness lower bound, GRASP explicitly models subset interactions through a quadratic geometric penalty. To achieve pretraining-scale efficiency without relying on hidden oracle tuning, we couple low-dimensional feature sketches with a strictly finite lower-confidence bound selection protocol. Extensive subset-retraining evaluations demonstrate that GRASP decisively outperforms existing scalable baselines. It more than doubles the task-level rank correlation for counterfactual subset fidelity while reducing upfront artifact construction costs by nearly an order of magnitude. Downstream diagnostics further show that this scoring mechanism transfers to language model curation and cross-domain vision selection, establishing a robust foundation for optimizing massive pretraining corpora.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.
Builds on
20 of 43 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,164
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 796
- 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
8 more
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
- 2023TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at Scalecited by 283
- 2018Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networkscited by 187
- 2024OLMES: A Standard for Language Model Evaluationscited by 106
- 2024Data Shapley in One Training Runcited by 81
- 2025Organize the Web: Constructing Domains Enhances Pre-Training Data Curationcited by 76
- 2024Scalable Influence and Fact Tracing for Large Language Model Pretrainingcited by 42
- 2026GEM: Geometric Entropy Mixing for Optimal LLM Data Curationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Where Not to Learn: Prior-Aligned Training with Subset-based Attribution Constraints
- 2024ICONS: Influence Consensus for Vision-Language Data Selection
- 2025PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection
- 2026ACPO: Counteracting Likelihood Displacement in Vision-Language Alignment with Asymmetric Constraints
- 2026DOG-DPO:Dynamic Optimization in Geometry for Safety Alignment
- 2026Preference Data Selection for Mitigating the Alignment Tax in Large Language Models
- 2026MGPO: Manifold-Guided Diffusion Alignment for Task-Aware Dataset Distillation
- 2026Prompt Tuning for CLIP on the Pretrained Manifold