mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ACPO: Counteracting Likelihood Displacement in Vision-Language Alignment with Asymmetric Constraints

arXiv 2603.22165 ↗First posted 23 Mar 2026cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

While Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become the de facto approach for aligning Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), it suffers from Likelihood Displacement, where the probability of both chosen and rejected responses collapses. This optimization flaw is especially detrimental in multimodal settings: the erosion of chosen likelihoods -- a failure we term Visual Anchor Collapse -- causes models to abandon visual evidence for strong language priors, precipitating significant hallucinations. To address this, we propose Asymmetric Constrained Preference Optimization (ACPO), a modality-agnostic alignment mechanism that applies dynamic, target-oriented scaling to preference optimization. ACPO derives a complexity-aware scaling coefficient applied exclusively to the rejected reward, asymmetrically suppressing the gradient flow on the rejected term while preserving the chosen distribution as a gradient-stable reference. While fundamentally a general-purpose objective, breaking this gradient symmetry is crucial for multimodal tasks, as it mitigates the suppression of visual tokens by language priors. Experiments on InternVL models demonstrate that ACPO effectively reverses the chosen-reward degradation of standard DPO. By halting Visual Anchor Collapse, ACPO generally outperforms baselines on hallucination benchmarks (HallusionBench, MM-IFEval) and general leaderboards (MMBench, MMStar, OCRBenchV2) while driving concurrent improvements in general capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 33 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Mar 2026.

Builds on

33 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction Following10 Apr
  2. 2025SimpleVQA: Multimodal Factuality Evaluation for Multimodal Large Language Models18 Feb
  3. 2023MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?12 Jul
  4. 2023InstructBLIP: Towards General-purpose Vision-Language Models with Instruction Tuning11 May

Other references · 29

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  6. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  7. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,833
  8. 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,179
  9. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
  10. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Rewardcited by 951
  11. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
  12. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 893
17 more
  1. 2018Object Hallucination in Image Captioningcited by 661
  2. 2023HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 572
  3. 2024ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Modelcited by 556
  4. 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
  5. 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 404
  6. 2023Analyzing and Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 314
  7. 2023AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluationcited by 293
  8. 2023Detecting and Preventing Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Modelscited by 254
  9. 2024Smaug: Fixing Failure Modes of Preference Optimisation with DPO-Positivecited by 239
  10. 2023Woodpecker: Hallucination Correction for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 223
  11. 2024Multi-Modal Hallucination Control by Visual Information Groundingcited by 196
  12. 2024Disentangling Length from Quality in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 194
  13. 2024OCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoningcited by 165
  14. 2023Evaluation and Analysis of Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 99
  15. 2024β-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic βcited by 89
  16. 2024Unintentional Unalignment: Likelihood Displacement in Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 66
  17. 2025DPO-Shift: Shifting the Distribution of Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Re-Align: Aligning Vision Language Models via Retrieval-Augmented Direct Preference Optimization
  2. 2025Token-Level Inference-Time Alignment for Vision-Language Models
  3. 2026PEA-DPO: Perception-Enhanced Alignment Direct Preference Optimization for MLLMs Alignment
  4. 2025AdaViP: Aligning Multi-modal LLMs via Adaptive Vision-enhanced Preference Optimization
  5. 2026LVRPO: Language-Visual Alignment with GRPO for Multimodal Understanding and Generation
  6. 2024Fine-Grained Verifiers: Preference Modeling as Next-token Prediction in Vision-Language Alignment
  7. 2024Task Preference Optimization: Improving Multimodal Large Language Models with Vision Task Alignment
  8. 2024MIA-DPO: Multi-Image Augmented Direct Preference Optimization For Large Vision-Language Models