mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Synthics: Synthetic Physics-like Datasets for Machine Learning

arXiv 2606.06724 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Representative data is fundamental in machine learning, as limited data hinders generalisation. Collecting sufficient real-world samples is often infeasible. Synthetic data generation offers a practical solution, but only if the generated data faithfully reflects the structure of real observations. In this paper, a method for generating synthetic regression datasets that structurally resemble physics equations from a given equation corpus is presented. The approach uses a Bayesian Probabilistic Context-Free Grammar to capture the underlying algebraic structure of the corpus, from which novel equations are sampled. To ensure the generated inputs lie within a physically meaningful domain, the applicability domain is characterised for each equation through non-intrusive probing, also recovering inter-variable constraints. Input sampling further mimics realistic experimental conditions by drawing from random sub-ranges of the valid domain with mixed uniform and truncated normal distributions. The generated data is statistically validated against the Feynman equation corpus using Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. The generated equations match the corpus on all of the eight studied structural features, compared to only two for an unsmoothed purely probabilistic grammar, demonstrating that the Bayesian prior is essential for structural fidelity given the size of the corpus. In a downstream hyperparameter-tuning task, a gradient-boosted regressor tuned on the synthetic data picks, on average, the 6th-best configuration out of 20 on real data, matching the result of tuning on real data itself and substantially outperforming random expression trees (10th) and noise (19th).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

Builds on

17 of 31 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
  2. 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,498
  3. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
  4. 2014OpenML: networked science in machine learningcited by 526
  5. 2018Training Deep Networks with Synthetic Data: Bridging the Reality Gap by Domain Randomizationcited by 294
  6. 2017Grammar Variational Autoencodercited by 285
  7. 2018Meta-Learning: A Surveycited by 256
  8. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 203
  9. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 192
  10. 2022Interpretable Scientific Discovery with Symbolic Regression: A Reviewcited by 105
  11. 2023Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regressioncited by 79
  12. 2025Mitra: Mixed Synthetic Priors for Enhancing Tabular Foundation Modelscited by 77
5 more
  1. 2020Probabilistic Grammars for Equation Discoverycited by 36
  2. 2023Efficient Generator of Mathematical Expressions for Symbolic Regressioncited by 13
  3. 2025Chance-constrained Flow Matching for High-Fidelity Constraint-aware Generationcited by 7
  4. 2017Active Expansion Sampling for Learning Feasible Domains in an Unbounded Input Spacecited by 1
  5. 2025Can Test-time Computation Mitigate Reproduction Bias in Neural Symbolic Regression?cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.