Flatland: The Adventures of Gradient Descent with Large Step Sizes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The training of neural networks often entails objective functions that are not globally L-smooth. For these functions, it is both theoretically and practically difficult to reply to the question: what is the largest possible step size that ensures the convergence of gradient descent (GD)? We address this longstanding open question in deep learning by providing a unifying definition of "large" step sizes that requires only local Lipschitz (or even H"older) continuity of the gradient. We design first-order adaptive methods that provably yield large step sizes and show that they operate at the edge of stability (EoS) right from the start of the training. In particular, the loss decreases nonmonotonically and the product between the step size and sharpness, i.e., the largest eigenvalue of the Hessian, stays above the EoS threshold of 2 throughout training. Using our method, we are also able to minimize the sharpness all the way down to its global minimum. Contrary to expectation, we find that encountering globally-flat regions too early in the training may both slow down convergence and jeopardize the generalization ability of the network. Exploiting a self-stabilization argument, we allow GD to enter slightly sharper valleys and turn unsuccessful training runs into very successful ones.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.
Builds on
3 of 47 references.
References · 3
- 2017EMNIST: an extension of MNIST to handwritten letterscited by 213
- 2025Negative Stepsizes Make Gradient-Descent-Ascent Convergecited by 11
- 2025What Can Grokking Teach Us About Learning Under Nonstationarity?cited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.