Complexity-Balanced Diffusion Splitting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Standard continuous-time generative models rely on monolithic architectures that must navigate vastly different signal regimes, from isotropic noise to intricate data distributions. While scaling model capacity improves performance, deploying a massive network uniformly across the entire generative timeline is inherently inefficient. In this work, we propose Complexity-Balanced Splitting (CBS), a principled framework for temporal capacity allocation that distributes the generative workload across multiple specialized sub-networks. Grounded in function approximation theory and de Boor's equidistribution principle, CBS partitions the diffusion timeline into segments of equal approximation burden, allocating more representational capacity to regions where the generative dynamics are more difficult to model. To estimate this local complexity, we introduce two complementary and tractable monitor functions: a spatial measure based on the flow's Dirichlet energy, and a geometric measure based on the acceleration of the sampling trajectories. Using a lightweight auxiliary model to estimate these complexity profiles, our approach eliminates the need for heuristic temporal splits or computationally expensive search procedures. Extensive evaluation across multiple architectures (SiT, JiT, and UNet) and datasets demonstrates that CBS consistently improves synthesis quality without increasing per-step inference cost. In particular, CBS improves FID by ~35% on SiT-XL with CFG relative to naive temporal partitioning. Project page is available at https://noamissachar.github.io/CBS/.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.
Builds on
23 of 34 references.
References · 23
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 9,122
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 6,054
- 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,847
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
- 2021Cascaded Diffusion Models for High Fidelity Image Generationcited by 1,163
- 2025Qwen-Image Technical Reportcited by 1,044
- 2019Improved Precision and Recall Metric for Assessing Generative Modelscited by 944
11 more
- 2022eDiff-I: Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with an Ensemble of Expert Denoiserscited by 931
- 2024SiT: Exploring Flow and Diffusion-based Generative Models with Scalable Interpolant Transformerscited by 737
- 2016Error bounds for approximations with deep ReLU networkscited by 574
- 2020How to train your neural ODE: the world of Jacobian and kinetic regularizationcited by 228
- 2023RAPHAEL: Text-to-Image Generation via Large Mixture of Diffusion Pathscited by 142
- 2022ERNIE-ViLG 2.0: Improving Text-to-Image Diffusion Model with Knowledge-Enhanced Mixture-of-Denoising-Expertscited by 112
- 2020Learning Differential Equations that are Easy to Solvecited by 81
- 2024Scaling Laws For Diffusion Transformerscited by 44
- 2023Multi-Architecture Multi-Expert Diffusion Modelscited by 35
- 2024Switch Diffusion Transformer: Synergizing Denoising Tasks with Sparse Mixture-of-Expertscited by 31
- 2023Denoising Task Routing for Diffusion Modelscited by 28
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.