mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RedEdit: Agentic Red-Teaming of Image Safety Classifiers via MCTS-Guided Photo-Editing

arXiv 2606.06140 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2026cs.CRcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Image safety classifiers serve as a critical component of contemporary content moderation systems on the internet. However, their resilience against user-style malicious image editing remains underexplored. Such behaviors are highly prevalent in daily scenarios but difficult to fully reproduce. To explore this vulnerability, we introduce RedEdit, a novel black-box red-teaming agent that formulates photo-editing evasion as a combinatorial search problem over edit-tool sequences. It adopts a Vision-Language-Model (VLM)-based proposer to generate semantically targeted candidate edits and a Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) planner to prioritize promising edit paths while backtracking from ineffective ones. Together, the proposer and planner instantiate two key capabilities of human attackers, i.e., domain knowledge and iterative backtracking, respectively, to reproduce this practical threat. Our extensive experiments on UnsafeBench reveal profound systemic vulnerabilities: fewer than two edits on average enable 76.2% of unsafe images to evade detectors, while retaining 93.0% malicious semantics, meaning that such manipulated content remains perceptually malicious to humans while easily bypassing automated moderation. We therefore appeal to the community for more attention to this overlooked practical threat.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 13 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

Builds on

13 of 21 references.

References · 13

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2022Red-Teaming the Stable Diffusion Safety Filtercited by 264
  4. 2023Ring-A-Bell! How Reliable are Concept Removal Methods for Diffusion Models?cited by 250
  5. 2023MMA-Diffusion: MultiModal Attack on Diffusion Modelscited by 194
  6. 2023SneakyPrompt: Jailbreaking Text-to-image Generative Modelscited by 189
  7. 2022Can Machines Help Us Answering Question 16 in Datasheets, and In Turn Reflecting on Inappropriate Content?cited by 155
  8. 2025T2ISafety: Benchmark for Assessing Fairness, Toxicity, and Privacy in Image Generationcited by 48
  9. 2024IDEATOR: Jailbreaking and Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models Using Themselvescited by 37
  10. 2025Distraction is All You Need for Multimodal Large Language Model Jailbreakingcited by 36
  11. 2024ART: Automatic Red-teaming for Text-to-Image Models to Protect Benign Userscited by 35
  12. 2025Red-Teaming Text-to-Image Systems by Rule-based Preference Modelingcited by 8
1 more
  1. 2026TreeTeaming: Autonomous Red-Teaming of Vision-Language Models via Hierarchical Strategy Explorationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025DREAM: Scalable Red Teaming for Text-to-Image Generative Systems via Distribution Modeling
  2. 2026RISE: Red-teaming via Iterative Strategy Evolution for Modern Text-to-Image Models
  3. 2026Automatic Red Teaming for Implicit Vulnerabilities of Text-to-Image Models
  4. 2025AgentTypo: Adaptive Typographic Prompt Injection Attacks against Black-box Multimodal Agents
  5. 2025REDEditing: Relationship-Driven Precise Backdoor Poisoning on Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
  6. 2026RedEvoAgent: Automatic Red-Teaming Agent with Experience-Driven Skill Evolution
  7. 2026MIRROR: Novelty-Constrained Memory-Guided MCTS Red-Teaming for Agentic RAG
  8. 2026Protective Perturbations Must Survive the Resize: Scale-Robust Image Immunization against Malicious Editing